Explicit and reflective teaching for the development of Critical Thinking skills and Nature of Science and Technology understandings in Primary Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci/2025v30n1p313Keywords:
nature of science, critical thinking, elementary education, reflective teachingAbstract
This study seeks to contribute to the development of critical thinking (CT) skills and nature of science (NOS) concepts in primary education – more specifically, argument analysis (CT) and certain aspects of the external sociology of science, such as scientific decision making and the compromise between the positive and negative effects of science and technology (NOS). The study involved the participation of 72 students from 5 different schools. It was a mixed-design study, using tools such as questionnaires, observation charts and interview scripts. The results showed significant improvement in argument analysis questionnaire scores and in NOS concepts after the explicit and reflective work done in a teaching-learning sequence. These results were confirmed by classroom observation, the analysis of workbooks and student interviews within a month of the intervention. This enabled us to conclude that the intervention had a positive impact on the development of the skills and concepts under study, even in the face of variation as a result of differences in teaching-learning sequence implementation by different teachers in different contexts. The reflective teaching approach can be identified as one of the keys to intervention success.References
Acevedo, J.A. (2009). Enfoques explícitos versus implícitos en la enseñanza de la naturaleza de la ciencia. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 6(3), 355-386. https://revistas.uca.es/index.php/eureka/article/view/3681
Acevedo, J. A., García-Carmona, A., & Aragón, M. M. (2016). Un caso de Historia de la Ciencia para aprender Naturaleza de la Ciencia: Semmelweis y la fiebre puerperal. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 13(2), 408-422. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2016.v13.i2.13
Acevedo, J. A., García-Carmona, A., & Aragón, M. M. (2017). Enseñar y aprender sobre naturaleza de la ciencia mediante el análisis de controversias de historia de la ciencia. Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura
Alaminos, A., & Castejón, J .L. (2006). Elaboración, análisis e interpretación de encuestas, cuestionarios y escalas de opinión. Marfil.
Albert, M. J. (2009). La investigación educativa. Claves teóricas. Mc Graw Hill.
Brock, R., & Park, W. (2022). Distinguishing Nature of Science Beliefs, Knowledge and Understandings, Towards Clarity and Coherence in Educational Goals Related to the Nature of Science. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00368-6
Cobo-Huesa, C., Abril, A. M., & Ariza, M. R. (2022). Conocimiento didáctico del contenido sobre naturaleza de la ciencia y pensamiento crítico en la formación inicial de profesorado de Primaria. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias 19(3), 3602. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2022.v19.i3.3602
Cullinane, A., & Erduran, S. (2022). Nature of Science in Preservice Science Teacher Education–Case Studies of Irish Pre-service Science Teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 34(2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2022.2042978
Dagher, Z. R., & Erduran, S. (2016). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education. Why does it matter? Science & Education, 25(1), 147-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9800-8
Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical Thinking. Prentice-Hall.
Erduran, S., Ardac, D., & Yakmaci-Guzel (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: case studies of pre-service secondary science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75442
Erduran, S., & Dagher, R. F. (2014). Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education. Springer.
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Executive Summary ‘The Delphi Report’.
Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. American Psychologist, 53(4), 449-455. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.4.449
Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge. An Introduction to Critical Thinking. Psychology Press.
Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the nature of science. Science & Education, 20(7-8), 591-607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9293-4
Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2014). New directions for nature of science research. In M. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 999-1021). Springer.
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. & Puig, B. (2012). Argumentation, evidence evaluation and critical thin-king. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1001-1015). Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_66
Khishfe. R. (2022). Relationship Between Nature of Science and Argumentation: a Follow‑Up Study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10307-0
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R .L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Towards valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
Librea‑Carden, M. R. & Mulvey, B.K. (2023). The Potential of Nature of Science (NOS) in Special
Education (SPED): Preservice Teachers’ Conceptions, Plans, and Identifed NOS Implications for SPED. Research in Science Education, 53, 1097–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10125-6
López-Pastor V.M., & Pérez-Pueyo, A. (Coords.) (2017). Buenas prácticas docentes. Evaluación formativa y compartida en educación: experiencias de éxito en todas las etapas educativas. Universidad de León. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=686946
Manassero, M.A., & Vázquez, A. (2019). Conceptualización y taxonomía para estructurar los conocimientos acerca de la ciencia. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 16(3), 3104-3117. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2019.v16.i3.3104
Manassero-Mas, M. A., & Vázquez, A. (2023). Enseñar y aprender a pensar sobre la naturaleza de la ciencia. Un juego de cartas como recurso en educación primaria. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2023.v20.i2.2202
Matthews, M. (2012). Changing the focus: From nature of science (NOS) to features of science (FOS). In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in nature of science research (pp. 3-26). Springer.
McComas, W. F. (2002). The Nature of Science in Science Education, Rationales and Strategies. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Nieto, S. (2010). Principios, métodos y técnicas esenciales para la investigación educativa. Dykinson.
Ortega-Quevedo, V., & Gil-Puente, C. (2019). La naturaleza de la ciencia y la tecnología. Una experiencia para desarrollar el pensamiento crítico. Revista Científica, 35(2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.14483/23448350.14095
Ortega-Quevedo, V., Gil-Puente, C., Vallés, C., & López-Luengo, M. (2020). Diseño y validación de instrumentos de evaluación de Pensamiento Crítico en Educación. Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis, 48, 91-110. https://doi.org/10.17227/ted.num48-12383
Ortega-Quevedo, V., Gil-Puente, C., & Vallés, C., (2022a). Decisiones científico-tecnológicas y equilibrios en la ciencia y la tecnología. Una propuesta basada en el desarrollo del pensamiento. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, 27(1), 223-244. https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2022v27n1p223
Ortega-Quevedo, V., Gil-Puente, C., & Vallés, C., (2022b). La enseñanza de la energía en sexto de Educación Primaria. ENSAYOS, Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete, 37(1), 83-101. http://www.revista.uclm.es/index.php/ensayos
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What ‘ideas-aboutscience’ should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692-720.
Pleasants, J., Clough, M .P., Olson, J. K., & Miller. G. (2019) Fundamental Issues Regarding the Nature of Technology. Science & Education, 28, 561–597 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00056-y
Porras, Y., Tuay, N., & Ladino, Y. (2020). Desarrollo de la habilidad argumentativa en estudiantes de educación media desde el enfoque de la Naturaleza de la Ciencia y la Tecnología. Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis, 48, 143-161. https://doi.org/10.17227/ted.num48-11486
Quijano, S. A., Soto, A. M., & Gil, M. J. (2014). Estrategia didáctica basada en preguntas para favorecer el pensamiento crítico en la clase de gestión ambiental en el Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano. Producción + Limpia, 9(1), 63-72.
Rezaei, I., & Saghazadeh, A. (2022). Introduction on THINKING: Bioengineering of Science and Art. In I. Rezaei & A. Saghazadeh (Eds.), Thinking Bioengineering of Science and Art (pp. 1-39). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04075-7
Ritchhart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2014). Hacer visible el pensamiento. Cómo promover el compromiso, la comprensión y la autonomía de los estudiantes. Paidós.
Summers, R. (2024). Appraising Instructional Materials from TeachersPayTeachers for Features of NGSS Design and Nature of Science. Research in Science Education, 54, 523–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10146-1
Swartz, R.J. (2013). Thinking-Based Learning. Making the Most of What we Have Learned About Teaching Thinking in the Regular Classroom to Bring Out the Best in Our Students. Educational Leadership, 65(5).
Taber, K.S. (2017). Reflecting the nature of science in science education. In K. S. Taber & B. Akpan (Eds.), Science Education: An International Course Companion (pp. 23-37). Sense Publishers.
Tenreiro-Vieira, C., & Vieira, R.M. (2021). Promover o pensamento crítico e criativo no ensino das ciências: propostas didáticas e seus contributos em alunos portugueses. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, 26(1),70-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2021v26n1p70
Tenreiro-Vieira, C., & Vieira, R.M. (2020). Promover o Pensamento Crítico em Contextos CTS: Desenvolvimento de Propostas Didáticas para o Ensino Básico. Indagatio Didactica, 12(4), 471-484. https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i4.21823
Torres, N. Y., & Solbes, J. (2016). Contribuciones de una intervención didáctica usando cuestiones sociocientíficas para desarrollar el pensamiento crítico. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 34(2), 43-65. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.1638
Valente, B., Maurício, M., & Faria, C. (2024). The Influence of Real‑Context Scientific Activities on Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Thinking and Practice of Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry. Science & Education, 33, 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00377-5
Vázquez, A., & Manassero, M.A. (2018). Más allá de la comprensión científica: educación científica para desarrollar el pensamiento. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 17(2), 309-336. https://cutt.ly/9mPw7aR
Vazquez-Alonso, A., Garcia-Carmona, A., Manassero-Mas, M., & Bennassar-Roig, A. (2013). Science Teachers’ Thinking About the Nature of Science: A New Methodological Approach to Its Assessment. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 781-808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9291-4
Vega, Y. & Callejas, M. (2020). Compuestos inorgánicos en el ambiente. Secuencia de enseñanza y aprendizaje (sea) para desarrollar pensamiento crítico en su aprendizaje. Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis: ted, 48, 181-201.
Voss, S., Kruse, J., & Kent-Schneider, I. (2022). Comparing student responses to convergent, divergent, and evaluative nature of science questions. Research in Science Education, 52, 1277–1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-10009-7
Yacoubian, H., & Khishfe, R. (2018). Argumentation, critical thinking, nature of science and socioscientific issues: A dialogue between two researchers. International Journal of Science Education, 40(7), 796-807. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1449986
Yalvac, B., Tekkaya, C., Cakiroglu, J., & Kahyaoglu, E. (2007). Turkish Pre-service Science Teachers’ Ciews on Science-Technology-Society Issues, International Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 331-348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600708667
Zeidler, D. L. (2003). The Role of Moral Reasoning and Discourse in Science Education. Kluwer Academic Publishers
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vanessa Ortega-Quevedo, Cristina Gil-Puente, Cristina Vallés Rapp, Carmela García-Marigómez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
IENCI is an Open Access journal, which does not have to pay any charges either for the submission or processing of articles. The journal has adopted the definition of the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI), which states that the users have the right to read, write down, copy, distribute, print, conduct searches and make direct links with the complete texts of the published articles.
The author responsible for the submission represents all the authors of the work and when the article is sent to the journal, guarantees that he has the permission of his/her co-authors to do so. In the same way, he/she provides an assurance that the article does not infringe authors´ rights and that there are no signs of plagiarism in the work. The journal is not responsible for any opinions that are expressed.
All the articles are published with a Creative Commons License Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International. The authors hold the copyright of their works and must be contacted directly if there is any commercial interest in the use of their works.
