“So the Lights Have Bent”: Investigation of Pre-Service Teachers’ Conceptions of Science Through a Historical Narrative on the General Relativity Theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2024v29n2p201Keywords:
Arthur Eddington; General Relativity Theory; Historical Narrative; History and Philisophy of Science; Physics Teaching.Abstract
Research in Science Education has advocated the use of historical narratives as a teaching and learning strategy across different levels of education. The main arguments supporting this approach are: i) the shared similarities between the human cognitive system and the structure of narratives; ii) the constant presence of narratives and their importance in human development. In education, historical narratives are viewed favorably because they stimulate emotional and cognitive connections with the reader/listener, either by eliciting feelings such as empathy and identification or by fostering greater engagement, understanding, and memorization of the narrated topics. In this study, conducted with pre-service physics teachers, we employed a historical episode from the Theory of General Relativity (T.G.R.) - the expedition of the total solar eclipse on May 29, 1919 - presented in the form of a historical narrative. The goal was to promote and contextualize discussions about science, its nature, its relationship with socio-historical context, and the influence of non-epistemic aspects on scientific practices. More specifically, by exploring the impacts of political conflicts on science and investigating the influences of World War I on the establishment of T.G.R., we characterized and problematized the epistemological conceptions of the teacher trainees regarding the relationships between science and politics. The construction of the historical narrative incorporated elements from previous research narratives and was guided by studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. The text was interrupted by "THINK!" questions to facilitate discussion and encourage students to take sides with the characters in the narrative, making them an integral part of the story and allowing them to experience some of the dilemmas and decisions involved in scientific work. The "THINK!" discussions were proposed and conducted in a way that allowed us to identify, classify, and problematize the epistemological conceptions of the research subjects. Data were collected through questionnaires (the "THINK!" questions themselves) and class discussions, which were recorded and transcribed to serve as the basis for data analysis. Subsequently, the conceptions were classified into the following analytical categories: rationalism, relativism, and moderate stances. To encompass other perceived conceptions, categories such as "common sense" and "naive relativism" were added. Overall, besides finding historical narratives as a strategy to guide and contextualize debates about the Nature of Science, we observed a prevalence of relativistic-leaning conceptions, emphasizing social aspects over the content of science in the analysis of issues related to the relationships between science and political conflicts. We also noted prescriptive and descriptive conceptions about these relationships, i.e., how they are and how they should be.References
Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2004). Methodology and Politics: a proposal to teach the structuring ideas of the philosophy of science through the pendulum. Science & Education, 13(7), 717-731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-5720-8
Adúriz-Bravo, A., & Chion, A. R. (2006). El Pensamiento Narrativo en la Enseñanza de las Ciencias. Inter-Ação, 41(3), 691-714. https://doi.org/10.5216/ia.v41i3.41940
Allchin, D. (2013). Teaching the Nature of Science: Perspectives & Resources. Saint Paul, United Sates of America: SHiPS Education Press.
Avraamidou, L., & Osborne, J. (2008). The Role of Narrative in Science Education. International Journal of Science Education, 31(4), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802380695
Bagdonas, A. (2020). A Favor e Contra o Método: a tensão entre racionalismo e anarquismo epistemológico na controvérsia entre Big Bang e Estado Estacionário. Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física, 37(3), 1250-1277. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2020v37n3p1250
Bagdonas, A. (2019). História da Física para o Ensino de Física como Cultura: debates sobre a neutralidade da ciência no período entreguerras. In A. F. P. Martins (Org.). Física, Cultura e Ensino de Ciências (pp. 195-214). São Paulo, SP: Livraria da Física.
Bagdonas, A., Zanetic, J., & Gurgel, I. (2018). O Maior Erro de Einstein? Debatendo o papel dos erros na ciência através de um jogo didático sobre cosmologia. Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física 35(1). https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2018v35n1p97
Bagdonas, A. (2015). Discutindo a Natureza da Ciência a Partir de Episódios da História da Cosmologia. (Dissertação de mestrado). Programa de Pós-Graduação Interunidades em Ensino de Ciências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP. Recuperado de: https://doi.org/10.11606/D.81.2011.tde-19072011-112602
Bagdonas, A., Zanetic, J., & Gurgel, I. (2014). Controvérsias Sobre a Natureza da Ciência como Enfoque Curricular para o Ensino de Física: o ensino de história da cosmologia por meio de um jogo didático. Revista Brasileira de História da Ciência, 2(7), 242-260. https://doi.org/10.53727/rbhc.v7i2.199
Bal, M., & Boheemen, C. (2009). Narratology: introduction to the theory of narrative. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Barthes, R., & Duisit, L. (1975). An Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narrative. New Literary History, 6(2), 237-272. Recuperado de https://www.uv.es/fores/Barthes_Structural_Narrative.pdf
Basílio, S. (2020). O Eclipse Solar de Maio de 1919 e as Relações Científicas Entre Brasil e Inglaterra. Em Construção, 7. https://doi.org/10.12957/emconstrucao.2020.48102
Berger, A. A. (1997). Narratives in Popular Culture, Media, and Everyday Life. Los Angeles, United Satets of America: SAGE Publications, Inc., https:// doi.org/10.4135/9781452243344
Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of Meaning: four lectures on mind and culture. Cambridge, United States of America: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1996). The Culture of Education. Cambridge, United States of America: Harvard University Press.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1994). Investigação Qualitativa em Educação: uma introdução à teoria e aos métodos. Porto, Portugal: Porto.
Cardoso, D., Noronha, A., Watanabe, G., & Gurgel, I. (2015). Texto Jornalístico sobre Ciência: uma análise do discurso sobre a natureza da ciência. Alexandria: Revista de Educação Em Ciência E Tecnologia, 8(3), 229. https://doi.org/10.5007/1982-5153.2015v8n3p229
Chalmers, A. (1993). O que é Ciência Afinal? São Paulo, SP: Brasiliense.
Clough, M. (2011). The Story Behind the Science: bringing science and scientists to life in post-secondary science education. Science & Education, 20, 701-717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9310-7
Creswell, John, & Miller, Dana. (2000). Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
Domingos, F. (2022). Sobre a Influência do “Não-Epistêmico” na Prática Científica de Arthur S. Eddington (1882-1944): o caso da expedição do eclipse solar de 29 de maio de 1919. (Dissertação de mestrado). Programa de Pós-Graduação Interunidades em Ensino de Ciências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP. Recuperado de https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/81/81131/tde-12092022-113101/
Dyson, F. (1917). On the Opportunity afforded by the Eclipse of 1919 May 29 of verifying Einstein's Theory of Gravitation, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 5(77). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/77.5.445
Egan, K. (1986). Memory, Imagination, and Learning: connected by the story. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(6), 455-459.
Einstein, A. (1911). On the Influence of Gravitation on the Propagation of Light. Annalen der Physik, 35, 898-908. Recuperado de https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol3-trans/393
Einstein, A. (1915 a). On the General Theory of Relativity. Plenary Session of the Prussian Academy of Science, November 4, 1915, 98-107.
Recuperado de https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol6-trans/110
Einstein, A. (1915 b). On the General Theory of Relativity (Addendum). Plenary Session of the Prussian Academy of Science, November 11, 1915, 108-110.
Recuperado de https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol6-trans/120
Einstein, A. (1915 c). Explanation of the Perihelion of Mercury from the General Theory of Relativity. Plenary Session of the Prussian Academy of Science, November 18, 1915, 112-116.
Recuperado de https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol6-trans/124
Einstein, A. (1915 d). The Field Equations of Gravitation. Plenary Session of the Prussian Academy of Science, November 25, 1915, 117-120.
Recuperado de https://einsteinpapers.press.princeton.edu/vol6-trans/129
Einstein, A. (1919). Time, Space and Gravitation: The Newtonian System. The Times. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/1646406
Eisenstaedt, J., & Videira, A. A. P. (1995). A Relatividade Geral Verificada: o eclipse de Sobral 29/05/1919. Einstein e o Brasil. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: UFRJ.
El-Hani, C., Tavares, E., & Rocha, P. (2004). Concepções epistemológicas de estudantes de biologia e sua transformação por uma proposta explícita de ensino sobre história e filosofia das ciências. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, 9(3), 265-313. Recuperado de https://ienci.if.ufrgs.br/index.php/ienci/article/view/529
Erduran, S. (2022). Trust in Science and Science Education - Part 1. Science & Education, 31(5), 1101-1104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00386-4
Ernst, E. (2008). Trick or Treatment?: Alternative Medicine on Trial. London, United Kingdom: Corgi Books.
Ferreira, M. V. R., & Silva, C. C. (2023). O Que o Caso do Kit Covid nos Ensina sobre a Natureza da Ciência em Sociedade. In Atas do XVII Encontro do Programa de Pós - Graduação Interunidades em Ensino de Ciências da Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Feyerabend, P. (2003). Contra o Método. São Paulo, SP: Unesp.
Forato, T. (2009). A Natureza da Ciência como Saber Escolar: um estudo de caso a partir da história da luz. (Tese de Doutorado), Faculdade de Educação, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.11606/T.48.2009.tde-24092009-130728
Fourez, G. (1995). A Construção das Ciências: Introdução à Filosofia e à Ética das Ciências. São Paulo, SP: Universidade Paulista.
Fry, R. (1917). Quaker Adventure: the story of nine years’ relief and reconstruction. London, United Kingdom: Frank - Maurice.
Gil-Pérez, D. (2001). Para uma Imagem Não Deformada do Trabalho Científico. Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 7, 125-153. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-73132001000200001
Góis, P. J. (2022). Dilemas Éticos Envolvendo a Produção de Armas Nucleares em um Jogo Didático. (Dissertação de mestrado). Mestrado Profissional em Ensino de Ciências e Educação Matemática, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG. Recuperado de http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/50362
Graham, S, & Harris, K. (2016). Evidence-Based Practice and Writing Instruction. Handbook of Writing Research, 2, 211-226.
Greca, I., & Freire Jr, O. (2004). A “Crítica Forte” da Ciência e Implicações para a Educação em Ciências. Ciência & Educação (Bauru)o, 10, 343-361. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-73132004000300004
Harari, Y. N. (2014). Sapiens: Uma Breve História da Humanidade. Porto Alegre, RS: L&PM.
Herman, D. (2009). Basic Elements of Narrative. Hoboken, United States of America: John Wiley & Sons.
Hodson, D. (2013). Nature of Science in the Science Curriculum: origin, development, implications and shifting emphases. In International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching, 911-970. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_28
Irzik, G. (2015). Values and Western Science Knowledge. In R. Gunstone (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Science Education (pp. 1093-1096). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0_384.
Jonckheere, R. (1915). Observatory, 485(1).
Kellog, R., & Phelan, J., & Scholes, R. (2006). The Nature of Narrative: revised and expanded. Oxford, The Kingdom: University Press.
Kevles, D. Albert Einstein: Relativity, War, and Fame. In Princeton University Press Staff. A Century in Books: Princeton University Press 1905-2005 (pp. 115-124). Princeton, United States of America: Princeton University Press, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691238173-014
Klassen, S. (2010). The Relation of Story Structure to a Model of Conceptual Change in Science Learning. Science & Education, 19, 305-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9212-8
Klassen, S., & Froese-Klassen, C. (2013). Science Teaching with Historically Based Stories: theoretical and practical perspectives. In International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching, 1503-1529. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_47
Kragh, H. (1996). Cosmology and Controversy: The Historical Development of Two Theories of the Universe. Princeton, United States of America: Princeton University Press.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, United States of America: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, I. (1970). History of Science and Its Rational Reconstructions. In Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 91-136. London, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3142-4_7
Lederman, N. (2013). The Development, Use, and Interpretation of Nature of Science Assessments. In: Matthews, M. (Ed.) In International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_29
Levinson, R. (2006). The Use of Narrative in Supporting the Teaching of Socio-Scientific Issues: a Study of Teachers’ Reflections. Interacções, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.25755/int.319
Lynas, M. (2018). Seeds of Science: why we get it so wrong on GMOs. New York, United States of America: Bloomsbury Sigma Press.
Marineli, F. (2020). O Terraplanismo e o Apelo à Experiência Pessoal como Critério Epistemológico. Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física, 37(3), 1173-1192. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2020v37n3p1173
Martins, A. F. P. (2015). Natureza da Ciência no Ensino de Ciências: uma proposta baseada em “temas” e “questões”. Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física, 32(3), 703-737. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2015v32n3p703
Martins, R. A. (2005). Física e História: o caso da teoria da relatividade. Ciência e Cultura, 57(3), 25-29. Recuperado de http://cienciaecultura.bvs.br/pdf/cic/v57n3/a15v57n3.pdf
Martins, R. A. (2006). Introdução: A História das Ciências e Seus Usos na Educação. In C. C. Silva (Org.) Estudos de História e Filosofia das Ciências: subsídios para aplicação no ensino. São Paulo, SP: Livraria da Física.
Matthews, M. (1995). História, Filosofia e Ensino de Ciências: a tendência atual de reaproximação. Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física, 12(3), 164-214.
Recuperado de https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/fisica/article/view/7084
Matthews, M. (1998). In Defense of Modest Goals When Teaching About the Nature of Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 35(2), 161-174.
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199802)35:2<161::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-Q
McComiskey, B. (2017). Post-Truth Rhetoric and Composition. Utah, United States of America: Utah State University Press.
McIntyre, L. (2018). Post - Truth. Cambridge, United States of America:: MIT Press.
Merton, R. (2013). Ensaios de Sociologia da Ciência. São Paulo, SP: Editora 34.
Metz, D., Klassen, S., McMillan, B., Clough, M., & Olson, J. (2007). Building a foundation for the use of historical narratives. Science & Education, 16(3–5), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-015-9233-y
Missner, M. (1985). Why Einstein Became Famous in America. Social Studies of Science, 15(2), 267-291. http://www.jstor.org/stable/285389
Mnookin, S. (2011). The Panic Virus: A True Story of Medicine, Science, and Fear. London, United Kingdom: Simon & Schuster Press.
Norris, S. (2005). A Theoretical Framework for Narrative Explanation in Science. Science Education, 89(4), 535-563. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20063
Lodge, O. (1914). Observatory, 479(1).
Oliveira, M. B. (2003). Considerações sobre a Neutralidade da Ciência. Transformação, 26, 161-172. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31732003000100008
Oreskes, N. (2021). Porque Confiar na Ciência?. Lisboa, Portugal: Gradiva.
Pivaro, G. F., & Girotto Jr. G. (2020). O Ataque Organizado à Ciência como Forma de Manipulação: do aquecimento global ao coronavírus. Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física, 37(3), 1074-1098. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2020v37n3p1074
Pivaro, G. F., & Girotto Jr. G. (2023). Características dos Discursos de Desinformação Relacionados aos Conhecimentos Científicos das Redes Bolsonaristas no Twitter. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Ensino de Ciências, 23(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2023u631655
Polati, F., & Cardoso, D. (2017). Arthur S. Eddington Provou a Teoria da Relatividade Geral? Uma Proposta de Atividade Histórica para Discutir a Natureza da Ciência. In Atas do XXII Simpósio Nacional de Ensino de Física. São Paulo, SP: Sociedade Brasileira de Física. Recuperado de https://sec.sbfisica.org.br/eventos/snef/xxii/sys/resumos/T1326-1.pdf
Rozentalski, E. F. (2018). Indo além da Natureza da Ciência: o filosofar sobre a Química por meio da ética química. (Tese de doutorado). Programa de Pós-Graduação Interunidades em Ensino de Ciências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP. https://doi.org/10.11606/T.81.2018.tde-16072018-141205
Sagan, C. (1993). Why We Need to Understand Science. Mercury, 22(2), 52-54. Recuperado de http://plaza.ufl.edu/trishak/Carl Sagan - Why We Need To Understand Science.pdf
Santos, N., & Auretta, C. (1992). Eddington e Einstein. Lisboa, Portugal: Gradiva
Schiffer, H., & Guerra, A. (2018). Problematizando Práticas Científicas em Aulas de Física: o uso de uma história interrompida para se discutir ciência de forma epistemológica-contextual. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 19(1), 95-127. https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2019u95127
Schiffer, H. (2019). Estudos Históricos de Práticas Científicas em Aulas de Física a Partir da Leitura e Escrita de Narrativas: construindo estratégias a partir de um Design Based. (Tese de doutorado). Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca - CEFET-RJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ. Recuperado de https://dippg.cefet-rj.br/ppcte/index.php/pt/teses-e-dissertacoes
Silva, C. C. (2006). Estudos de História e Filosofia da Ciência: subsídios para aplicação no Ensino. São Paulo, SP: Livraria da Física.
Slezak, P. (1994). Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Education: part I. Science & Education, 3, 265-294. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540157
Soares, D. (2014). O Encurvamento da Luz Segundo Soldner. [s.l.]: DSL Soares. http://lilith.fisica.ufmg.br/~dsoares/sobral/soldner.htm.
Stanley, M. (2003). “An Expedition to Heal the Wounds of War”: the 1919 eclipse and Eddington as a quaker adventurer. Isis, 94(1), 57-89. https://doi.org/10.1086/376099
Stanley, M. (2007). Practical Mystic: religion, science, and A. S. Eddington. Chicago, United States of Amercia: The University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, A. J. P. (1965). English History 1914-1945. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Paperbacks.
Thomson, J. J. (1919). Joint Eclipse Meeting of the Royal Society and the Royal Astronomical Society. The Observatory, 42, 389-398.
Recuperado de https://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1919Obs....42..389.
Whitehead, A. (2011). Science and the Modern World. London, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Zanetic, J. (1989). Física também é cultura. (Tese de doutorado). Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP. Recuperado de https://repositorio.usp.br/item/000731157
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Fernando Domingos, Alexandre Bagdonas, João Zanetic
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
IENCI is an Open Access journal, which does not have to pay any charges either for the submission or processing of articles. The journal has adopted the definition of the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI), which states that the users have the right to read, write down, copy, distribute, print, conduct searches and make direct links with the complete texts of the published articles.
The author responsible for the submission represents all the authors of the work and when the article is sent to the journal, guarantees that he has the permission of his/her co-authors to do so. In the same way, he/she provides an assurance that the article does not infringe authors´ rights and that there are no signs of plagiarism in the work. The journal is not responsible for any opinions that are expressed.
All the articles are published with a Creative Commons License Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International. The authors hold the copyright of their works and must be contacted directly if there is any commercial interest in the use of their works.
