Intuitive epistemology in university professors of natural and social sciences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2024v29n2p131Keywords:
Enseñanza-aprendizaje, Docentes universitarios, Epistemologías intuitivas, Cognición, Ciencias naturales-ciencias socialesAbstract
Educational research has pointed out the mediating role of professors' intuitive epistemologies in the teaching-learning processes of science. However, we find that research in this regard is scarce despite being essential to achieve changes in the teaching of natural and social sciences. The objective of this work is to examine the epistemological positions of teachers in the fields of science and philosophy to determine if the epistemological positions they hold vary depending on the domain of knowledge. To carry out this research, we used an instrument that consists of two parts: 1) items adapted from questionnaires in use about intuitive and self-developed epistemologies and 2) items from the Literature Epistemic Cognition Scale (LECS) questionnaire adapted to evaluate epistemic cognition in the context of philosophy. The data collected indicate that the participants in this research maintain a constant epistemological orientation in both the domain of science and philosophy.References
Apostolou, A., & Koulaidis, V. (2010). Epistemology and science education: A study of epistemological views of teachers. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(2), 149-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635141003750396
Brownlee, J., Purdie, N., & Boulton-Lewis, G. (2001). Changing epistemological beliefs in pre-service teacher education students. Teaching in Higher Education 6(2), 247-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510120045221
Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.004
García, M. B., Mateos, S. M., & Vilanova, S. L. (2016). ¿Qué concepciones sobre el conocimiento científico tienen los docentes universitarios de ciencias? Diseño, validación y aplicación de un cuestionario de dilemas para evaluar concepciones implícitas. Revista Docencia Universitaria, 17(1), 17-41. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7858482
Getahun, D. A., Saroyan, A., & Aulls, M. W. (2016). Examining undergraduate students' conceptions of inquiry in terms of epistemic belief differences. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 46(2), 181-205. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v46i2.185500
Guilfoyle, L., McCormack, O., & Erduran, S. (2020). The" tipping point" for educational research: The role of pre-service science teachers’ epistemic beliefs in evaluating the professional utility of educational research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 90, 103033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103033
Gunes, G., & Bati, K. (2018). Development of a Scale on Scientific Epistemological Views and investigation of epistemological views of prospective teachers. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(2), 391-408. Recuperado de https://www.ijres.net/index.php/ijres/article/view/360/pdf
Hashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers' epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199601)33:1<47::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-P
Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353-383. Recuperado de https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1011965830686
Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88-140. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543067001088
Howard, B. C., McGee, S., Schwartz, N., & Purcell, S. (2000). The experience of constructivism: Transforming teacher epistemology. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4), 455-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2000.10782291
Kampa, N., Neumann, I., Heitmann, P., & Kremer, K. (2016). Epistemological beliefs in science—a person-centered approach to investigate high school students' profiles. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 81-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.04.007
Kuhn, D., Cheney, R., & Weinstock, M. (2000). The development of epistemological understanding. Cognitive Development, 15(3), 309-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(00)00030-7
Lonka, K., Ketonen, E., & Vermunt, J. D. (2021). University students’ epistemic profiles, conceptions of learning, and academic performance. Higher Education, 81, 775-793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00575-6
Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Capturing science teachers’ epistemological beliefs: The development of the teacher beliefs interview. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(2), 38-53. Recuperado de https://ejrsme.icrsme.com/article/view/7794
Mackenzie, J., Good, R., & Brown J. R. (2014). Postmodernism and science education: An appraisal. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching, (pp. 1057-1086). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/Nueva York/ Londres: Springer.
Mardiha, S. M., & Alibakhshi, G. (2020). Teachers’ personal epistemological beliefs and their conceptions of teaching and learning: A correlational study. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1763230. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1763230
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching. The role of history and philosophy of science. New York, United States of America: Routlegde.
Matthews, M. R. (2015). Science teaching, 20th anniversary revised and expanded edition. New York, United States of America: Routledge.
Monroy Nasr, Z., López Manjón, A., & León-Sánchez R. (2022a). Epistemologías intuitivas en docentes universitarios. In Z. Monroy Nasr, R. León Sánchez, M. del C. Montenegro Núñez y G. Alvarez Díaz de León G. (Eds.), Epistemologías intuitivas en la enseñanza y aprendizaje de la ciencia y de la filosofía, (pp. 295-307). México: FFyL y DGAPA, UNAM. Recuperado de
https://ru.atheneadigital.filos.unam.mx/jspui/handle/FFYL_UNAM/7839
Monroy-Nasr, Z., León-Sánchez, R., & López-Manjón, A. (2022b). Intuitive epistemologies on the nature of science in university professors teaching psychology. 16th Biennial IHPST Conference, Calgary, Canada.
Pecharromán, I., & Pozo, J. I. (2008). Epistemologías intuitivas de los adultos: Influencia de la edad, el nivel de instrucción y el dominio de conocimiento. Estudios de Psicología, 29(3), 245-272. https://doi.org/ 10.1174/021093908786145412
Pérez-Echeverría, M. P., Mateos, M., Pozo, J. I., & Scheuer, N. (2001). En busca del constructivismo perdido: Concepciones implícitas sobre el aprendizaje y la enseñanza. Estudios de Psicología, 22(2), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1174/ 021093 901609479
Savasci-Acikalin, F. (2009). Teacher beliefs and practice in science education. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 10(1), Article 12. Recuperado de http://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v10_issue1_files/funda.pdf
Slezak, P. (2010). Radical constructivism: Epistemology, education and dynamite, Constructivist Foundations, 6(1) 102–111. https://constructivist.info/6/1/102.slezak
Slezak, P. (2014). Appraising constructivism in science education. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching (pp. 1023-1055) Dordrecht/Heidelberg/Nueva York/Londres: Springer.
Schiefer, J., Edelsbrunner, P. A., Bernholt, A., Kampa, N., & Nehring, A. (2022). Epistemic beliefs in science—A systematic integration of evidence from multiple studies. Educational Psychology Review, 34(3), 1541-1575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09661-w
Schommer, M. (1998). The influence of age and education on epistemological beliefs. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(4), 551-562. Recuperado de https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01311.x
Schommer, M., Calvert, C., Gariaglietti, G., & Bajaj, A. (1997). The development of epistemological beliefs among secondary students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology 89(1), 37-40). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.1.37
Suh, J. K., Hwang, J., Park, S., & Hand, B. (2022). Epistemic orientation toward teaching science for knowledge generation: Conceptualization and validation of the construct. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(9), 1651-1691. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21769
Tezci, E., Erdener, M. A., & Atici, S. (2016). The effect of pre-Service teachers' epistemological beliefs on teaching approaches. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(n12A), 205-215. Recuperado de https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1126076.pdf
Tsai, C. C. (2007). Teachers’ scientific epistemological views: The coherence with instruction and students’ views. Science Education, 91(2), 222-243. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20175
Tsai, C. C. (2000). Relationships between student scientific epistemological beliefs and perceptions of constructivist learning environments, Educational Research, 42(2), 193-205. https://doi.org/10.1080/001318800363836
Watson, E. (2020). The slippery business of measuring beliefs. Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 24(2), 119-140. Recuperado de https://ejrsme.icrsme.com/article/view/20294
Yukhymenko-Lescroart, M. A., Briner, S. W., Magliano, J. P., Lawless, K., Burkett, C., McCarthy, K. S. & Goldman, S. R. (2016). Development and initial validation of the Literature Epistemic Cognition Scale (LECS). Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 242-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.09.014
Zhou, Y., & Tan, D. (2020). The construction and initial application of Chinese college students’ epistemological beliefs questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 11:54. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00054
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zuraya Monroy-Nasr, Rigoberto León-Sánchez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
IENCI is an Open Access journal, which does not have to pay any charges either for the submission or processing of articles. The journal has adopted the definition of the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI), which states that the users have the right to read, write down, copy, distribute, print, conduct searches and make direct links with the complete texts of the published articles.
The author responsible for the submission represents all the authors of the work and when the article is sent to the journal, guarantees that he has the permission of his/her co-authors to do so. In the same way, he/she provides an assurance that the article does not infringe authors´ rights and that there are no signs of plagiarism in the work. The journal is not responsible for any opinions that are expressed.
All the articles are published with a Creative Commons License Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International. The authors hold the copyright of their works and must be contacted directly if there is any commercial interest in the use of their works.