“As Quatro Luas de Galileu”: Guias e Visitantes Produzindo Momentos de Ensino-Aprendizagem durante Observações do Céu Noturno
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci/2025v30n1p168Palabras clave:
observación del cielo, momentos de enseñanza-aprendizaje, STEM, EtnometodologíaResumen
En este estudio, exploramos momentos de enseñanza y aprendizaje (MEAs), producidos por participantes en una actividad de divulgación científica realizada al aire libre. Tenemos como aporte metodológico la Etnometodología y Análisis de Conversación (EMAC), que son enfoques de carácter radicalmente praxeológico, es decir, adoptan una actitud natural hacia los datos (i.e., analizan interacciones que se producirían naturalmente, estuvieran o no sometidas a la observación empírica). Partiendo de esta perspectiva, analizamos en profundidad dos extractos grabados durante un evento de observación de Júpiter para explorar cómo los guías del observatorio ayudan a los visitantes a "traducir" conocimientos astronómicos abstractos en actividades prácticas realizadas en el telescopio. El trabajo proporciona un análisis de cómo los MEAs en entornos informales se adaptan a las contingencias locales y cómo su producción se asocia con el aquí-y-ahora de la interacción, y no puede describirse previamente con fines didácticos de estandarización.Referencias
Bailey, J. M. (2011). Astronomy education research: developmental history of the field and summary of the literature. https://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_168276.pdf
Button, G. (2008). Against ‘distributed cognition’. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(2),87–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407086792
Carlin, A. P., & Moutinho, R. (2020). Teaching and learning moments as subjectively problematic: Foundational assumptions and methodological entailments. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1848536
Carlin, A., Marques, J. B. V., & Moutinho, R. (2021). Investigating learning moments in astronomical observatories using video-recorded data. In M. Gill, &, C. Schorfheide (Orgs.), Sage Research Methods Cases (pp. 1–17). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529757989
Carlin, A., Marques, J. B. V., & Moutinho, R. (no prelo). Characterising astronomy communication sessions: Topical contextures and partitioning activities. In R. Smith, R. Fitzgerald, W. Housely, & T. Au-Yeung (Eds.), New Directions in Membership Categorisation Analysis. Brill.
Cocke, W. J., Disney, M. J., & Taylor, D. J. (1969). Discovery of optical signals from Pulsar NP 0532. Nature, 221, 525-527. https://doi.org/10.1038/221525a0
Coulter, J. (1991). Cognition: cognition in an ethnomethodological mode. In G. Button, Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences (pp. 176–195). Cambridge University Press.
Coulter, J. (1979). The social construction of mind. The Macmillan Press.
Coulter, J. (1971). Decontextualised meanings: current approaches to verstehende investigations. The Sociological Review, 19(3), 301–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1971.tb00634.x
Coulter, J., & Parsons, E. D. (1990). The praxiology of perception: Visual orientations and practical action. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 33(3), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749008602223
Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2016). Vision: envisioning a new generation of STEM learning research. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9713-5
Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-006-9027-1
Falk, J. H. (2002). The contribution of free-choice learning to public understanding of science. Interciencia, 27(2), 62-65.
Garfinkel, H. (2002) Ethnomethodology’s program: working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Garfinkel, H. (2021). Ethnomethodological misreading of Aron Gurwitsch on the phenomenal field: Sociology 271, UCLA 4/26/93. Human Studies, 4(1), 19–42.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-020-09566-z
Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall.
Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical action. In J. C. Mckinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments (338-366). Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E. (1981). The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11(2), 131–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839318101100202
Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-636. https://www.jstor.org/stable/682303
Goodwin, C. (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 97–121). Irvington Publishers.
Gurwitsch, A. (2010). The field of consciousness. In R. M. Zaner (Ed.), The collected works of Aron Gurwitsch (1901-1973): Volume III. Springer.
Jefferson, G. (1979). Techniques for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 79–96). Irvington Publishers.
Langhi, R., & Nardi, R. (2009). Ensino da astronomia no Brasil: educação formal, informal, não formal e divulgação científica. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 31(4), 4402/1–4402/11. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-11172009000400014
Lelliott, A., & Rollnick, M. (2010). Big ideas: a review of astronomy education research 1974-2008. International Journal of Science Education, 32(13), 1771–1799. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903214546
Lindwall, O. & Lymer, G. (2011). Uses of “understand” in science education. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 452–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.08.021
Lindwall, O., & Lymer, G. (2008). The dark matter of lab work: Illuminating the negotiation of disciplined perception in Mechanics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(2), 180–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400801986082
Marques, J. B. V., Carlin, A. P., & Gomes, M. (2024). Wonder and Awe observing the sky. Astronomy Education Journal, AstroEdu Conference 2023 Special Issue, 1–3. https://astroedjournal.org/index.php/ijae/article/view/97
Marques, J. B. V., Carlin, A. P., & Moutinho, R. (2022). A guided tour in the Geophysical and Astronomical Observatory of the University of Coimbra: Setting-specific practices in an informal educational environment. Educational Studies, 50(6), 1093–1113. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2022.2049594
Marques, J. B. V., Carlin, A. P., & Moutinho, R. (2020). Seeing by proxy: a detailed analysis of an educational interaction at the telescope. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 42, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9126-RBEF-2019-0354.
Marques, J. B. V. & Freitas, D. (2017). Fatores de caracterização da educação não formal: uma revisão da literatura. Educação e Pesquisa, 43(4), 1087-1110. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-9702201701151678
Mehan, H. (1978). Structuring school structure. Harvard Educational Review, 48(1), 32–64.
Moutinho, R., Carlin, A. P., & Marques, J. B. V. (2022). Visually informed accounts: instructed achievements during planetarium visits and sky observations. Visual Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572221130441
Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation: Volumes I & II. Basil Blackwell.
Sacks, H. (1985). Notes on methodology. In J. M. Atkinson (Ed.), Structures of social action (pp. 21–27). Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/412243
Salimpour, S., Bartlett, S., Fitzgerald, M., & Mckinnon, D. (2020). The gateway science: A review of Astronomy in the OECD school curricula, including China and South Africa. Research in Science Education, 51(1), 975–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09922-0
dos Santos, E. D., Malacarne, V., & Langhi, R. (2023). O ensino de astronomia e a formação de professores: aproximações e percepções no processo de ensino e aprendizagem nos anos iniciais do ensino fundamental. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, 28(3), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2023v28n3p49
Schegloff, E. A., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), 289-327. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
Schütz, A. (1970). On Phenomenology and social relations. The University of Chicago Press.
Simmel, G. (1917). Grundfragen der Soziologie: Individuum und Gesellschaft (Questões fundamentais da sociologia: Indivíduo e sociedade). Jazzybee Verlag.
Watson, R. & Gastaldo, É. (2015). Etnometodologia & Análise da Conversa. Vozes & Editora PUC-Rio.
Wieder, D. L. (1980). Behavioristic operationalism and the life-world: Chimpanzees and chimpanzee researchers in face-to-face interaction. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3-4), 75-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1980.tb00017.x
Wieder, L. (1974). Language and social reality: the case of telling the convict code. Mouton.
Zemel, A., & Koschmann, T. (2014). “Put your fingers right in here”: learnability and instructed experience. Discourse Studies, 16(2), 163–183. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24441941
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Szu Yu Lee, Raquel Abi-Sâmara, Joana Brás Varanda Marques, Ricardo Moutinho
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
La IENCI es una revista de acceso libre (Open Access) y no hay cobro de ninguna tasa ya sea por el envío o procesamiento de los artículos. La revista adopta la definición de la Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI), es decir, los usuarios tienen el derecho de leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar y hacer links directos a los textos completos de los artículos publicados en esta revista.
El autor responsable por el envío representa a todos los autores del trabajo y, al enviar este artículo para su publicación en la revista está garantizando que posee el permiso de todos para hacerlo. De igual manera, garantiza que el artículo no viola los derechos de autor y que no hay plagio en lugar alguno del trabajo. La revista no se responsabiliza de las opiniones emitidas en los artículos.
Todos los artículos de publican con la licencia Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0). Los autores mantienen sus derechos de autor sobre sus producciones y deben ser contactados directamente en el caso de que hubiera interés en el uso comercial de su obra.