Activity with Parents on the Computer “NanoAPC”: Contributions to the learning of Nanotechnology in the context of Chemistry subject

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2024v29n1p117

Keywords:

Chemistry Teaching, Nanotechnology, Activities with Parents on the Computer, Nanoliteracy

Abstract

Activities with Parents on the Computer are pedagogical tasks based on socially relevant disciplinary content with the aim of establishing the school-home connection and collaboration between parents and students, to promote digital literacy and literacy in a specific domain. This article addresses a study that aimed to investigate the contribution of the Activity with Parents on the Computer "NanoAPC", both for the development of knowledge of 8th grade students about the area of nanotechnology, and to raise awareness among parents/guardians for the said area. The activities were proposed in a formal learning environment, the school, but were carried out at home by the student and one of the parents or guardian. NanoAPC intended to help students to learn Chemistry contents contextualized with the advances and applications of nanotechnology in society, from a socio-scientific perspective. A quasi-experimental research plan was implemented, with 58 students and 58 parents/guardians participating. Students were divided into two experimental conditions that were tested: groups 1 and 2, subject to NanoAPC, but with a different initial intervention, and group 3, subject to an activity sheet. All groups were subjected to a questionnaire as a pre-test and post-test, respectively before and after the intervention. The results, resulting from the analysis of the pre-test and post-test and the answers given in the respective activity sheets, show that the students in groups 1 and 2 showed a significant improvement in their knowledge of nanotechnology compared to those in group 3. We conclude that the NanoAPC digital resource is useful for teachers who show an interest in addressing nanotechnology but who have time constraints due to curriculum management. In addition, it promotes the parent-student-computer triangulation and, consequently, raises parents' awareness of this area.

References

Blonder, R., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2016). Learning about Teaching the extracurricular topic of nanotechnology as a vehicle for achieving a sustainable change in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 345-372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9579-0

Blonder, R., & Sakhnini, S. (2012). Teaching two basic nanotechnology concepts in secondary school by using a variety of teaching methods. Chemical Education. Research and. Practice, 13, 500–516. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RP20026K

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, United States of America: Harvard University Press.

Cheng, P-H., Yang, Ya-T. C., Chang, S.-H G., & Kuo, F-R R. (2016), 5E Mobile Inquiry Learning Approach for Enhancing Learning Motivation and Scientific Inquiry Ability of University Students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 59 (2), pp. 147-153. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2015.2467352

Debry, M., Marschalek, I., Hofer, M., & Handler, K. (2014). D.7.6 - Policy Recommendations. Monitoring public opinion on Nanotechnology in Europe. NANOPINION - European Platform on Nano Outreach and Dialogue (NODE). Recuperado de http://results.nanopinion.archiv.zsi.at/download/nanopinion_D7_Policy_recommendations.pdf

Dodge, B. (1995). Some Thoughts about WebQuests. Recuperado de http://webquest.org/sdsu/about_webquests.html

Dorouka, P., Papadakis, S., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021). Nanotechnology and mobile learning: perspectives and opportunities in young children’s education. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(3), 237 - 252. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2021.10036680

Eilks, I., Markic, S., & Witteck, T. (2010). Collaborative innovation of the science classroom by Participatory Action Research—Theory and practice in a project of implementing cooperative learning methods in chemistry education. In M. Valenčič Zuljan & J. Vogrinc (Eds.), Facilitating effective student learning through teacher research and innovation (pp. 77–101). Ljubljana, Slovenia: Universy of Ljubljana.

Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G.; Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., Van Voorhis, & F. L. (2001). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Gaskell, G., Stares, S., Allansdottir, A., Allum, N., Castro, P., Esmer, Y., ... Wagner, W. (2010). Europeans and Biotechnology in 2010: Winds of change? Luxembourg: European Commission.

https://doi.org/10.2777/23393

Ghattas, N. I., & Carver, J. S. (2012). Integrating nanotechnology into school education: a review of the literature. Research in Science & Technological Education, 30(3), 271-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2012.732058

Hingant, B., & Albe, V. (2010). Nanosciences and nanotechnologies learning and teaching in secondary education: A review of literature. Studies in Science Education, 46(42), 121-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2010.504543

Johnson, G. M. (2010). Internet Use and Child Development: Validation of the Ecological Techno-Subsystem. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 176–185.

Retirado de https://www.learntechlib.org/p/75228/

Jones, M., Blonder, R., Gardner, G., Albe, V., Falvo, M., & Chevrier, J. (2013). Nanotechnology and Nanoscale Science: Educational challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 35(9),1490-1512. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.771828

Joubert, I., Geppert, M., Ess, S., Nestelbacher ,R., Gadermaier, G., Duschl, A., Bathke, A. C., & Himly, M. (2020). Public perception and knowledge on nanotechnology: A study based on a citizen science approach. NanoImpact, 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2019.100201

LeBlanc, S. (2020). Nanotechnology as a Tool for Science and Scientific Literacy. InP. Norris & L. Friedersdorf(Eds.) Women in Nanotechnology. Women in Engineering and Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19951-7_2

Lin, Shu-Fen, & Lin, Huann-shyang (2016). Learning nanotechnology with texts and comics: the impacts on students of different achievement levels. International Journal of Science Education, 38(8), 1373-1391. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1191089

Mandrikas, A., Michailidi E., & Stavrou D. (2020). Teaching nanotechnology in primary education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(4), 377-395. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1631783

Marschalek, I., & Hofer, M. (2017). Nano and the public. Nature Nanotech, 12, 92.. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2016.288

Martins, G. O., Gomes, C. A. S., Brocardo, J., Pedroso, J. V., Camilo, J. L. A., Silva, L. M. U., Encarnação, M. M. G. A., Horta, M. J., Calçada, M. T. C. S., Nery, R. F. V.,& Rodrigues, S. M. C. V. (2017). Perfil dos alunos à saída da escolaridade obrigatória. Ministério da Educação, Direção-Geral da Educação. Lisboa, Portugal. Recuperado de https://dge.mec.pt/sites/default/files/Curriculo/Projeto_Autonomia_e_Flexibilidade/perfil_dos_alunos.pdf

Ministério da Educação, Portugal. (2018a). Aprendizagens Essenciais – 3.º Ciclo do Ensino Básico | Físico-Química Recuperado de https://www.dge.mec.pt/programas-e-metas-curriculares/fisico-quimica

Ministério da Educação, Portugal. (2018b). Aprendizagens Essenciais – 10º ano | Física e Química A. Recuperado de http://www.dge.mec.pt/sites/default/files/Curriculo/Aprendizagens_Essenciais/10_fq_a.pdf

Murday, J. (2009). Partnership for nanotechnology education. NSF Report. Recuperado de http://www.nsf.gov/crssprgm/nano/reports/educ09_murdyworkshop.pdf

Orgill, M. ,& Wood, S. (2014). Chemistry Contributions to Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Education: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Nano Education, 6, 83-108. https://doi.org/10.1166/jne.2014.1065

Paiva, J. (2010). Atividades com os Pais no Computador (APC). Boletim da Sociedade Portuguesa de Química, 118, 57-60.

Recuperado de https://b-quimica.spq.pt/magazines/BSPQuimica/648/article/30001575

Paiva, J. C., Morais, C., & Moreira, L. (2017). Activities with Parents on the Computer: An Ecological Framework. Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 1–14.

Paiva, J., & Reis, E. (2012). Atividades com os Pais no Computador – Acerto de Equações Químicas. Boletim da Sociedade Portuguesa de Química, 125, 79-84.

Recuperado de https://b-quimica.spq.pt/magazines/BSPQuimica/655/article/30001759

Palma-Oliveira, J. M., Gaspar de Carvalho, R., Luís, S., & Vieira, M. (2009). Knowing much while knowing nothing. Perception and Misperception about Nanomaterials. In I. Linkov, & J. Steevens, Nanotechnology: Risks and Benefits (pp. 437-462). Netherlands: Springer.

Pampa-Quispe, N. B., & Torres-Acurio, J. (2023). Nanociencia y nanotecnología en la educación actual: una propuesta interdisciplinaria emergente poscovid-19. MOMENTO, (66), 90–109. https://doi.org/10.15446/mo.n66.102031

Park J. E. (2019). Nanotechnology Course Designed for Non-Science Majors To Promote Critical Thinking and Integrative Learning Skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 96, 1278−1282. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00490

Ponte, C., & Simões, J. A. (2015). “Comportamentos online de crianças e jovens portugueses”. In G. L. Miranda (Org.) Psicologia dos comportamentos online. (pp. 51-80.). Lisboa, Portugal: Relógio d’ Água.

Roco, M. C. (2011). The long view of nanotechnology development: the National Nanotechnology Iniciative at 10 year. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 13, 427- 445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-010-0192-z

Roco, M. C., Hersam, M. C., Mirkin, C. A. (2011). Nanotechnology research directions for societal needs in 2020 - retrospective and outlook. Berlin: Springer.

Sahin, N., & Ekli, E. (2013). Nanotechnology awareness, opinions and risk perceptions among middle school students. International Journal of Technology and Desing Education, 23, 867–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-013-9233-0

Sakhnini, S., & Blonder, R. (2015). Essential Concepts of Nanoscale Science and Technology for High School Students Based on a Delphi Study by the Expert Community. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11) 1699-1738. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1035687

Sakhnini, S., & Blonder, R. (2016). Nanotechnology applications as a context for teaching the essential concepts of NST. International Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 521-538. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1152518

Schönborn, K. J., Höst, G. E., & Lundin Palmerius, K. E. (2015). Measuring understanding of nanoscience and nanotechnology: development and validation of the nano-knowledge instrument (NanoKI). Chemical Education. Research and. Practice, 16, 346-354. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00241E

Sebastian, V., & Gimenez, M. (2016). Teaching Nanoscience and thinking nano at the macroscale: Nanocapsules of wisdom. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 489 – 495. 2nd International Conference on Higher Education Advances, HEAd´16, 21-23 Junho 2016, Valencia, España. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.075

Stevens, S., Sutherland, L., & Krajcik, J. (2009). The ‘big ideas’ of nanoscale science and Engineering. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association press. Recuperado de https://static.nsta.org/pdfs/samples/PB241Xweb.pdf

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Yawson, R. M. (2012). An epistemological framework for nanoscience and nanotechnology literacy. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22, 297–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9145-1

Published

2024-05-04

How to Cite

Silva, N., Paiva, J., & Morais, C. (2024). Activity with Parents on the Computer “NanoAPC”: Contributions to the learning of Nanotechnology in the context of Chemistry subject. Investigations in Science Education, 29(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2024v29n1p117