Science documentaries in teacher training courses: contributions to the critical reading on global warming
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2020v25n2p01Keywords:
Science Documentaries, Teacher Training, Global Warming, Discourse Analysis, Science CommunicationAbstract
In this study, we analyze an activity carried out with pre-service physics teachers from a federal institution in the state of São Paulo. The activity's main goal was to investigate the discourse produced by these teachers when engaging in a debate about the possible causes of global warming after watching two science documentaries. The first is called An Inconvenient Truth and the second The Great Global Warming Swindle. Both of them use rhetorical and symbolic strategies, as scientist testimonials, graphics, simulations, images, etc. to argue in favor of 1) Anthropogenic causes and 2) Natural causes of global warming. The following questions guided our analysis: Did the rhetorical strategies used in these documentaries contribute to the positioning of these pre-service teachers in relation to the causes of global warming? If so, in which way? To which extent may this contribute to the development of scientific media literacy activities in teacher training? The analysis was carried out with the theoretical support of French Discourse Analysis, mainly by means of the works published in Brazil by Eni Orlandi, as well as the scholarly of Science Communication and Documentary. The analysis suggests that documentary style along with historical and contextual aspects might influence the final positioning of teachers in relation to the causes of global warming.References
Almeida, M. J. P. M. (2004). Discursos da ciência e da escola: ideologia e leituras possíveis. Campinas, SP: Mercado das Letras.
Almeida, M. J. P. M., & Silva, H. C. (1994). Noções auxiliares na compreensão do fazer pedagógico. Educação & Sociedade, (47), 97–105.
Arroio, A., & Giordan, M. (2006). O vídeo educativo: aspectos da organização do ensino. Química nova na escola, (24), 8-11. Recuperado de http://qnesc.sbq.org.br/online/qnesc24/eqm1.pdf
Bartlett, M. (2009). Representations of the Apocalypse: Debating the merits of An Inconvenient Truth and The Great Global Warming Swindle. Screen Education, (53), 34–41. Recuperado de http://ruby.fgcu.edu/courses/twimberley/EnviroPhilo/Apocalypse.pdf
Bazalgette, C. (1999). Making movies matter. London, United Kingdom: British Film Institute.
Bonitzer, P. (1986). The Silences of the Voice. In P. Rosen (Ed.). Narrative, Apparatus, Ideology: A Film Theory Reader (pp. 319-334). New York, United States of America: Columbia University Press.
Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14(2), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001
Boykoff, M. T. (2008). The real swindle. Nature Reports, 1(803), 31–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/climate.2008.14
Boykoff, M. T. (2011). Who Speaks for the Climate? New York, United States of America: Cambridge University Press.
Bucchi, M. (2013). Style in Science Communication. Public Understanding of Science, 22(8), 904–915. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513498202
Cooper, C, B. (2011). Media Literacy as a key strategy toward improving public acceptance of climate change science. Bioscience, 61(3), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.3.8
Christensen, E. F., & Lassen, K. (1991) Length of the solar cycle: an indicator of solar activity closely associated with climate. Science, New Series, (254), p. 698 – 700. https://DOI: 10.1126/science.254.5032.698
Damon, P. E., & Laut, P. (2004). Pattern of strange errors plagues solar activity and terrestrial climate data. Eos, 85(39), 370–374. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004EO390005
Durkin, M. (2007). The great global warming swindle. London, United Kingdom: BBC.
Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: the importance of theories and their development. New York, United States of America; London, United Kingdom: Teachers College Press.
Fallik, O., Rosenfeld, S., & Eylon, B. S. (2013). School and out-of-school science: a model for bridging the gap. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.822166
Godmillow, J., & Shapiro, A. L. (1997). How Real is the Reality in Documentary Film? History and Theory, 36(4), 80-101. Recuperado de https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/0018-2656.00032
Guerra, A., & Morais, A. (2013). História e a filosofia da ciência: caminhos para a inserção de temas física moderna no estudo de energia na primeira série do Ensino Médio. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 35(1), 1502-1–1502-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-11172013000100018
Guggenheim, D., & Gore, A. (2006). An inconvenient truth.
Hofstein, A., & Rosenfeld, S. (1996). Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning. Studies in Science Education, 28, 87–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269608560085
Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction, and opportunity. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Jarman, R., & Mcclune, B. (2007). Developing scientific literacy: using news media in the classroom. Maidenhead, United Kingdom: Open University Press.
Jarman, R., & Mcclune, B. (2010). A survey of the use of newspapers in science instruction by secondary teachers in Northern Ireland. International Journal of Science Education, 24(10), 997–1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210095311
Jones, D., Watkins, A., Braganza, K., & Coughlan, M. (2007). The Great Global Warming Swindle: a critique. Bulletin of the Australian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society, 20(3), 63–72. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237288047_The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle_a_critique
Kachan, M., Guilbert, S., & Bisanz, G. L. (2006). Do teachers ask students to read news in secondary science? Evidence from the canadian context. Science and Education, 90(3), 496–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20113
Laut, P. (2003). Solar activity and terrestrial climate: an analysis of some purported correlations. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 65, 801–812. Recuperado de http://stephenschneider.stanford.edu/Publications/PDF_Papers/Laut2003.pdf
Livingstone, S. (2010). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies. The Communication Review, 7(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420490280152
Manzo, K. (2017). The usefulness of climate change films. Geoforum, 84, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.006
Mcbean, G. A., & Hengeveld, H. G. (2000). Communicating the Science of Climate Change: A Mutual Challenge for Scientists and Educators. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5(1), 9–23. Recuperado de https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ637999.pdf
Mcclune, B., Jarman, R. (2012). Encouraging and equipping students to engage critically with science in the news: what can we learn from the literature? Studies in Science Education, (48), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2012.655036
Mellor, F. (2009). The Politics of Accuracy in Judging Global Warming Films. Environmental Communication, 3, 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030902916574
Mellor, F. (2018). Configuring Epistemic Authority: The Significance of Film Style in Documentaries about Science. Science in Context, 31(1), 134 – 59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889718000042
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London, United Kingdom: King’s College London.
Nichols, B. (1991). Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary. Bloomington, United States of America: Indiana University Press.
Nichols, B. (2002). Introduction to documentary. Bloomington, United States of America: Indiana University Press.
Nichols, B. (2016). Speaking Truths with Film - Evidence, Ethics, Politics in Documentary. California, United State of America: University of California Press.
Nielsen, J. A. (2013). Delusions About Evidence: On Why Scientific Evidence Should Not Be the Main Concern in Socioscientific Decision Making. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(4), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2013.845323
Ofcom. (2008). Ofcom Broadcast Bulletin, 114, 6–22.
Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2011). Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Climate Change. Bloomsbury, United States of America: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Orlandi, E. P. (2001). Discurso e leitura (6a ed.). Campinas, SP: Editora da Unicamp.
Orlandi, E. P. (2007). Análise de Discurso: princípios & procedimentos (7a ed.). Campinas, SP: Pontes.
Orlandi, E. P. (2012). Discurso e Texto - Formulação e Circulação dos Sentidos (4a ed.). Campinas, SP: Pontes.
Pereira, A. A. G. P., & Almeida, M. J. P. M (2017). The documentary Cave of Forgotten Dreams: activities in the formation of physics teachers. Comunicação & Educação, 22(2), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9125.v22i2p49-63
Ramos, M. B., & Silva, H. C. (2014). Educação em ciência e em audiovisual: olhares para a formação de leitores de ciências. Cadernos CEDES, 34, 51–67. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ccedes/v34n92/a04v34n92.pdf
Reid, G. (2012). The television drama-documentary (dramadoc) as a form of science communication. Public Understanding of Science, 21(8), 984-1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511414982
Reid, G., & Norris, S. P. (2016). Scientific media education in the classroom and beyond: a research agenda for the next decade. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11, 147–166. https://DOI 10.1007/s11422-015-9709-1
Rezende, L. A. (2008). História das ciências no ensino de ciências: contribuições dos recursos audiovisuais. Ciência em Tela, 1(2), 1-7. Recuperado de http://www.cienciaemtela.nutes.ufrj.br/artigos/0208rezende.pdf
Rezende, L. A. C., Pereira, M. V., & Vairo, A. C. (2011). Recursos audiovisuais como temática de pesquisa em periódicos brasileiros de Educação em Ciências. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 11(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2018v35n2p592
Santos, P. C., & Arroio, A. (2009). A utilização de recursos audiovisuais no ensino de ciências: tendências nos Enpecs entre 1997 – 2007. In Anais do Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, Florianópolis, SC. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290989975_A_utilizacao_de_recursos_audiovisuais_no_ensino_de_ciencias_Tendencias_nos_Enpecs_entre_1997_e_2007
Silva, H. C. (2006). Lendo imagens na educação científica: construção e realidade. Pro-Posições, 17, 71–83. Recuperado de https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/proposic/article/view/8643656/11173
Sturgis, P., & Allum, N. (2004). Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 13(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662504042690
Washington, H., & Cook, J. (2011). Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand. London, United Kingdom; New York, United States of America: Earthscan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
IENCI is an Open Access journal, which does not have to pay any charges either for the submission or processing of articles. The journal has adopted the definition of the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI), which states that the users have the right to read, write down, copy, distribute, print, conduct searches and make direct links with the complete texts of the published articles.
The author responsible for the submission represents all the authors of the work and when the article is sent to the journal, guarantees that he has the permission of his/her co-authors to do so. In the same way, he/she provides an assurance that the article does not infringe authors´ rights and that there are no signs of plagiarism in the work. The journal is not responsible for any opinions that are expressed.
All the articles are published with a Creative Commons License Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International. The authors hold the copyright of their works and must be contacted directly if there is any commercial interest in the use of their works.