Misconceptions about evolution: a comparative study between undergraduate biology majors and graduate students

Authors

  • Leonardo Augusto Luvison Araújo Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Educação. Avenida da Universidade Butantã 05508040 - São Paulo, SP - Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2020v25n2p332

Keywords:

Evolution education, Evolutionary biology, Misconceptions, Higher education

Abstract

Challenges to evolution education are widely discussed in the academic literature. Four decades of research have revealed a surprisingly high prevalence of misconceptions about evolution among students at all levels. Considering the relevance of this theme, this paper aims to compare the presence of misconceptions about evolution among Brazilian biology students at different study levels: beginner and advanced undergraduate students and at the post-graduation level. A research questionnaire with statements that express misconceptions about evolution was developed and validated, being applied in two editions of an extension course attended by students from different public and private universities. 46 responses from beginner undergraduate biology students, 42 responses from advanced undergraduates, and 34 responses from post-graduate students were obtained, totaling 122 completed questionnaires. The comparative analysis indicated an average reduction in misconceptions according to the progress in the academic formation of students. Significant differences between undergraduate and graduate students were found in some items, with the post-graduation group presenting a lower frequency of misconceptions about natural selection and adaptation. However, even in these questions, there is a high percentage of agreement in all groups. Together, the data discussed here indicate the need for special attention regarding the misconceptions related to natural selection, adaptation, and interpretation of phylogenies in the education of teachers, biologists, and even graduate students.

Author Biography

Leonardo Augusto Luvison Araújo, Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Educação. Avenida da Universidade Butantã 05508040 - São Paulo, SP - Brasil

Pesquisador de pós-doutorado na Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Doutor em Educação pela Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). 

References

Alters, B. J., & Nelson, C. E. (2002). Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution, 56(10), 1891-1901. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00115.x

Amorim, D. S. (2002). Fundamentos de Sistemática Filogenética. Ribeirão Preto, SP: Holos.

Balbinotti, M. A. (2005). Para se avaliar o que se espera: reflexões acerca da validade dos testes psicológicos. Aletheia, 21, 43-52.

Baum, D. A., Smith, S. D., & Donovan, S. S. (2005). The tree-thinking challenge. Science, 310(5750), 979-980. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1117727

Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of research in science teaching, 27(5), 415-427. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270503

Buckberry, S., & Silva, K. B. (2012). Evolution: improving the understanding of undergraduate biology students with an active pedagogical approach. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5(2), 266-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-012-0416-z

Caponi, G. (2005). O darwinismo e seu outro, a teoria transformacional da evolução. Scientiae Studia, 3(2), 233-242. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662005000200004

Clough, E., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1985). How secondary students interpret instances of biological adaptation. Journal of Biological Education, 19(2), 125-130.

Freeman, S., & Herron, J. C. (2009). Análise evolutiva. Porto Alegre, RS: Artmed.

Futuyma, D. J. (1992). Biologia evolutiva. (2a ed.). Ribeirão Preto, SP: SBG.

Gil-Pérez, D., Montoro, I. F., Alís, J. C., Cachapuz, A., & Praia, J. (2001). Para uma imagem não deformada do trabalho científico. Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 7(2), 125-153. Recuperada de https://www.scielo.br/pdf/ciedu/v7n2/01.pdf

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2001). Three kinds of adaptationism. In S. H. Orzack, & E. Sober (Eds.), Adaptationism and Optimality (pp. 335-357). Cambridge University Press.

Gregory, T. R. (2008). Understanding evolutionary trees. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(2), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0035-x

Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution: Education and outreach, 2(2), 156-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0128-1

Gregory, T. R., & Ellis, C. A. (2009). Conceptions of evolution among science graduate students. BioScience, 59(9), 792-799. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2009.59.9.10

Hernández-Nieto, R. A. (2002). Contributions to Statistical Analysis. Mérida, Venezuela: Universidad de Los Andes.

Mayr, E. (2004). What makes biology unique? Considerations on the autonomy of a scientific discipline. Cambridge University Press.

Meir, E., Perry, J., Herron, J. C., & Kingsolver, J. (2007). College students' misconceptions about evolutionary trees. The American Biology Teacher, 69(7), 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2007)69[71:CSMAET]2.0.CO;2

Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2008). Measuring knowledge of natural selection: A comparison of the CINS, an open?response instrument, and an oral interview. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1131-1160. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20251

Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. New York, United States of America: McGraw Hill.

Oleques, L. C., Bartholomei, M. L. S., & Boer, N. (2011). Evolução biológica: percepções de professores de biologia. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 10(2), 243-263. Recuperada de http://reec.uvigo.es/volumenes/volumen10/ART2_VOL10_N2.pdf

Oliveira, G., & Bizzo, N. (2015). Evolução biológica e os estudantes brasileiros: conhecimento e aceitação. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, 20(2), 161-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2016v20n2p161

Paesi, R. A. (2018). Evolução humana nos livros didáticos de Biologia: o antropocentrismo em questão. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 17(1), 143-166. Recuperada de http://reec.uvigo.es/volumenes/volumen17/REEC_17_1_7_ex1176.pdf

Pazza, R., Penteado, P. R., & Kavalco, K. F. (2010). Misconceptions about evolution in Brazilian freshmen students. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3(1), 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-009-0187-3

Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social work research, 27(2), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/27.2.94

Shanahan, T. (2000). Evolutionary progress? BioScience, 50(5), 451-459. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0451:EP]2.0.CO;2

Sinatra, G. M., Brem, S. K., & Evans, E. M. (2008). Changing minds? Implications of conceptual change for teaching and learning about biological evolution. Evolution: Education and outreach, 1(2), 189-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0037-8

Stearns, S. C. (1989). Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Functional ecology, 3(3), 259-268. Recuperada de https://www.jstor.org/stable/2389364

Tidon, R., & Lewontin, R. C. (2004). Teaching evolutionary biology. Genetics and molecular biology, 27(1), 124-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572004000100021

Ziadie, M. A., & Andrews, T. C. (2018). Moving evolution education forward: a systematic analysis of literature to identify gaps in collective knowledge for teaching. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(1), ar11. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-08-0190

Downloads

Published

2020-08-31

How to Cite

Araújo, L. A. L. (2020). Misconceptions about evolution: a comparative study between undergraduate biology majors and graduate students. Investigations in Science Education, 25(2), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2020v25n2p332

Issue

Vol. 25 No. 2 (2020): Agosto de 2020

Section

Artigos

License

IENCI is an Open Access journal, which does not have to pay any charges either for the submission or processing of articles. The journal has adopted the definition of the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI), which states that the users have the right to read, write down, copy, distribute, print, conduct searches and make direct  links with the complete texts of the published articles.

The  author responsible for the submission  represents all the authors of the work and when the article is sent to the journal, guarantees that he has the permission of his/her co-authors to do so. In the same way, he/she provides an assurance that the article does not infringe authors´ rights and that there are no signs of plagiarism in the work. The journal is not responsible for any opinions that are expressed.

All the articles are published with a Creative Commons License Attribution Non-commercial  4.0 International. The authors hold the copyright of their works and must be contacted directly if there is any commercial interest in the use of their works.