Evaluation of group work in a Remote and Emergency Physics Course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2022v27n1p245Keywords:
Group Work, Emergency Remote Education and COVID-19, Science EducationAbstract
The need for social distancing due to the Covid-19 pandemic resulted in radical changes in education. Within a short period of time, face-to-face instruction was replaced by emergency remote teaching (ERT). In this setting, group work was either set aside or restructured to make use of modern communications technology. In this research, we investigate a teaching and learning environment where teachers and students tried to find the best conditions to deal with ERT. The research aims to understand how a specific group work activity, performed by secondary school students in a social distancing setting happened, and how this experience affected students. Our research goals are to: 1- understand student behavior within groups and the objective conditions in which the work was done; 2- identify students’ learning perception during this experience; 3- evaluate student engagement during group work. This research is quantitative and descriptive. The research focuses on the improvement of teaching and learning of physics. The data we analyzed was produced from the students’ answers to a questionnaire containing three sections, which was conceived with these specific goals in mind. The research results show that: (a) the groups functioned in a satisfactory manner; (b) most students overcame the difficulties they encountered during the activity; (c) a significant amount of students regarded the activity as a good learning experience; (d) a significant portion of students showed signs of engagement.References
Anderson, D., Thomas, G. P, & Nashon S. M. (2008). Social barriers to meaningful engagement in biology field trip group work. Science Education, 93(3), 511-534. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20304
Paula, H. F. (2017). Fundamentos Pedagógicos para o Uso de Simulações e Laboratórios Virtuais no Ensino de Ciências. Revista Brasileira De Pesquisa Em Educação Em Ciências, 17(1), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec201717175
Paula, H. F., Moreira, A. F. (2014). Atividade, Ação Mediada e Avaliação Escolar. Educação em Revista. 30(1), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-4698201400010000
Paula, H. F., Talim, S. L., Salema, C. S., Camillo, V. R. (2021). Engajamento de estudantes em um ensino remoto e emergencial de Física. Ensaio: Pesquisa em Educação e Ciências, 23, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172021230117
Bezerra, K. P., Costa, K. F. de L., Oliveira, L. C., Fernandes, A. C. L., Carvalho, F. P. B., & Nelson, I. C. A. S. R. (2020). Ensino remoto em universidades públicas estaduais: o futuro que se faz presente. Research, Society and Development, 9(9). http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i9.7226
Blatchford, P., Baines, E., Rubie-Davies, C., Bassett. P., & Chowne, A. (2006). The effect of a new approach to group work on pupil–pupil and teacher–pupil interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 750–765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.4.750
Brito, J. V. da C. S. de, Rodrigues, S. dos S., & Ramos, A. S. M. (2021). Lições aprendidas da experiência dos docentes no ensino remoto no contexto da pandemia da COVID-19. Holos – IV Dossiê COVID-19 e o mundo em tempos de pandemia, 37(4), 1-25. Recuperado de https://www2.ifrn.edu.br/ojs/index.php/HOLOS/article/view/11614/pdf
But, A. (2018). Quantification of influences on student perceptions of group work. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 15(5). Recuperado de https://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol15/iss5/8
Carneiro, L. A., Rodrigues, W., França, G., & Prata, D. N. (2020). Uso de tecnologias no ensino superior público brasileiro em tempos de pandemia COVID-19. Research, Society and Development, 9(8). http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i8.5485
Chang, B., & Kang, H. (2016). Challenges facing group work online. Distance Education, 37(1), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1154781
Crato, N. (2020). A grande ilusão. Saber & Educar: oportunidades e desafios em educação matemática, 28. http://dx.doi.org/10.17346/se.vol28.390
Ekblaw, R. (2016). Effective use of group projects in online learning. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 9(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42070-7_43
Fredricks, J.A., Wang, M., Linn, J.S., Hofkens, T.L., Sung, H.C., Parr, A.K., & Allerton, J. (2016). Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement. Learning and Instruction, 43, 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.009
Gaudet, A.D., Ramer, L.M., Nakonechny, J., Cragg, J. J., & Ramer, M. S. (2010). Small-group learning in an upper-level university biology class enhances academic performance and student attitudes toward group work. PLoS ONE, 5(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015821
Gomes, A. L. (2021). Impressões sobre o ensinar e o aprender em tempos de pandemia de COVID-19. Ensino Em Re-Vista, 28, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.14393/ER-v28a2021-14
Gonzaga, L. L. (2020). Precariedade, improvisação e espírito de corpo: representações sociais discursivas de professores da educação básica acerca da sua práxis no contexto da pandemia da COVID-19. Revista Prática Docente, 5(3), 1999-2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.23926/RPD.2526-2149.2020.v5.n3.p1999-2015.id860
Gunuc, S., & Kuzu, A. (2015). Student engagement scale: development, reliability and validity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 587-610. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.938019
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C, Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise Multivariada de Dados. Porto Alegre, RS: Bookman.
Klinko, J., & Carvalho, J. S. F. (2021). Escola remota: como resistir à domesticação da experiência escolar?. Estilos da Clínica, 26(1), 58-67. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1981-1624.v26i1p58-67
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London, England: Continuum.
Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning: visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science, Londres: Routledge, 87-113. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246905867_Multiplying_meaning_Visual_and_verbal_semiotics_in_scientific_text
Michael, J. (2006). Where's the evidence that active learning works?. Advances in physiology education, 30, 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006
Nasir, M.A., Janikowski, T., Guyker, W.M., & Wang, C. (2020). Modifying the Student Course Engagement Questionnaire for use with online courses. Journal of Educators Online, 17(1). Recuperado de https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1241583.pdf
Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2011). Nascidos na era digital: entendendo a primeira geração de nativos digitais. Porto Alegre, RS: Artmed.
Pires, A. (2021). A Covid-19 e a Educação Superior no Brasil: usos diferenciados das tecnologias de comunicação virtual e o enfrentamento das desigualdades educacionais. Revista semestral, 30(58), 83-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.18800/educacion.202101.004
Saraiva, K., Traversini, C., & Lockmann, K. (2020). A educação em tempos de COVID-19: ensino remoto e exaustão docente. Práxis Educativa, Ponta Grossa, 15, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.5212/PraxEduc.v.15.16289.094
Severo, J. L. R. L. (2021). Pedagogia da Ruptura: ocupando as margens do ensino remoto para criações didático-curriculares. Revista Espaço do Currículo, 14(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.1983-1579.2021v14n1.56411
Tichavsky, L. P., Hunt, A. N., Driscoll, A., & Jicha, K. (2015). “It’s just nice having a real teacher”: Student perceptions of online versus face-to-face instruction. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2015.090202
Veiga, F. H. (2016). Assessing student engagement in school: Development and validation of a four-dimensional scale. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 813-819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.153
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
IENCI is an Open Access journal, which does not have to pay any charges either for the submission or processing of articles. The journal has adopted the definition of the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI), which states that the users have the right to read, write down, copy, distribute, print, conduct searches and make direct links with the complete texts of the published articles.
The author responsible for the submission represents all the authors of the work and when the article is sent to the journal, guarantees that he has the permission of his/her co-authors to do so. In the same way, he/she provides an assurance that the article does not infringe authors´ rights and that there are no signs of plagiarism in the work. The journal is not responsible for any opinions that are expressed.
All the articles are published with a Creative Commons License Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International. The authors hold the copyright of their works and must be contacted directly if there is any commercial interest in the use of their works.