Thematic approach and complex scientific school knowledge: thematic and conceptual organization as proposals of open educational path
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2017v22n3p145Keywords:
Science Teaching, Complexity, Thematic Organization, Conceptual Organization, EnvironmentAbstract
In a traditional way, the school knowledge of the sciences, especially in high school, is consolidated from a set of conceptual contents that reflects a given historical construction of the referred science, whether Biology, Physics or Chemistry. In this format, textbooks generally present a more deterministic and reductionist view. There are several consequences, in this scheme that impact the formation of students, among them a mechanized learning and little contextual meaning. In an opposing movement to these limitations, the thematic approaches have been proposed and discussed in research of science teaching field, which propose a treatment of a given topic that is considered relevant for the formation of the youth. However, the organization by themes makes it difficult to integrate into the school curricular culture. Facing this question, this article intends to investigate potential ways of dealing with the two mentioned approaches (traditional and thematic methods), identifying possibilities for the building of knowledge with the potential to promote a more critical and reflexive formation. Methodologically, in this perspective, the research proposes a theoretical reflection from the complexity view about the works with themes, but considering the national school reality. From these considerations emerge the proposal of articulation between two forms of organization, conceptual and thematic, which create space for diversified choices by teachers, based on issues of their school daily life and their training goals. These choices are represented by what we call open thematic pathways. From the results, it may be concluded that the proposed strategies can promote an alternative view of science, the complexity idea, to address questions of an open and dynamic nature and, in this way; it may allow reflections about perceptions, attitudes and values. At same time, it aims to ways of acting of teachers with greater autonomy and protagonismReferences
Auler, D. (2002). Interações entre Ciência-Tecnologia-Sociedade no Contexto da Formação de Professores de Ciências. (Tese de Doutorado, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina), Florianópolis. Recuperado de http://repositorio.ufsc.br/xmlui/handle/123456789/82610
Auler, D. (2007). Enfoque Ciência-Tecnologia-Sociedade: Pressupostos para o Contexto Brasileiro. Ciência & Ensino, 1 (n. esp.)
Bardin, L. (2008). Análise de conteúdo. Portugal: Edição 70.
Beck, U. (2010). Sociedade de Risco. São Paulo: Editora 34.
Carvalho, F. R., Rodriguez-Marín, F., & Watanabe, G. (2016). The socio-environmental questions presented in the high school´s didactic books of physics. In 2nd World Conference on Physics Education. Brasil: IFUSP. Recuperado: http://www.wcpe2016.org/arquivos/Poster_Presentations_2final.pdf
Contreras, J. (2002). A autonomia de professores. São Paulo: Cortez.
Delizoicov, D., Angotti, J. A., & Pernambuco, M. M. (2002). Ensino de Ciências: fundamentos e métodos. São Paulo: Cortez.
Demo, P. (1997). Educar pela Pesquisa. Campinas: Autores Associados.
García, J. E. (1998). Hacia una teoría alternativa sobre los contenidos escolares. Espanha: Díada Editora.
Freire, P. (2005). Pedagogia do oprimido. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra.
Freschi, M., & Ramos, M. G. (2009). Unidade de Aprendizagem: um processo em construção que possibilita o trânsito entre senso comum e conhecimento científico. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 8(1), 156-170.
Halliday D., & Resnik, R. (2009). Fundamentos da Física Volume 2: Gravitação, Ondas e Termodinâmica. Rio de Janeiro: LTC.
Maldaner, O. A. (2007). Situações de Estudo no ensino médio: nova compreensão de educação básica. In Nardi, R. (Org.). Pesquisa em Ensino de Ciências no Brasil: alguns recortes. São Paulo: Escrituras.
Morin, E. (2007). Introdução ao pensamento complexo. (3a ed.). Porto Alegre: Sulina.
Nussenzveig, H. M. (1981). Curso de Física Básica: volume 2 - Fluidos. São Paulo: Editora Edgard Blücher.
Prigogine, I. (1996). O fim das certezas: tempo, caos e as leis da natureza. São Paulo: Editora da UNESP.
Reis, P. & Galvão, C. (2008). Os Professores de Ciências Naturais e a Discussão de Controvérsias Sociocientíficas: dois casos distintos. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 8(1), 746-772.
Santos, W.L.P., & Mortimer, E. F. (2000). Uma Análise de Pressupostos Teóricos da Abordagem C-T-S (Ciência-Tecnologia-Sociedade) no contexto da Educação Brasileira. Ensaio - Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 2(2), 133-162. DOI:10.1590/1983-21172000020202
Strieder, R. B. (2012). Abordagens CTS na Educação Científica no Brasil: sentidos e perspectivas. (Tese de Doutorado. Universidade de São Paulo), São Paulo. DOI:10.11606/T.81.2012.tde-13062012-112417
Strieder, R. B.; Watanabe, G., & Gehlen, S.T. (2012). Abordagem de temas no ensino médio: compreensões de professores de física. Revista Ensaio. Belo Horizonte.14(2),153-169. DOI:10.1590/1983-21172012140210
Tipler, P. (1995). Física Volume 2: Gravitação, Ondas e Termodinâmica. Rio de Janeiro: LTC.
Watanabe, G. (2012). Aspectos da complexidade: contribuições da Física para a compreensão do tema ambiental. (Tese de Doutorado, Universidade de São Paulo), São Paulo. Recuperado de http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/81/81131/tde-13082012 104627/publico/Giselle_Watanabe_Caramello.pdf
Watanabe, G. (2008). Elementos para uma abordagem temática: a questão das águas e sua complexidade. (Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade de São Paulo), São Paulo. Recuperado de http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/81/81131/tde-10042010-113405/publico/watanabe_kawamura_final.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
IENCI is an Open Access journal, which does not have to pay any charges either for the submission or processing of articles. The journal has adopted the definition of the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI), which states that the users have the right to read, write down, copy, distribute, print, conduct searches and make direct links with the complete texts of the published articles.
The author responsible for the submission represents all the authors of the work and when the article is sent to the journal, guarantees that he has the permission of his/her co-authors to do so. In the same way, he/she provides an assurance that the article does not infringe authors´ rights and that there are no signs of plagiarism in the work. The journal is not responsible for any opinions that are expressed.
All the articles are published with a Creative Commons License Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International. The authors hold the copyright of their works and must be contacted directly if there is any commercial interest in the use of their works.