Epistemic agency as a construct of science education field: theoretical issues and analytical proposals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2024v29n1p198Keywords:
Epistemic Agency, Science Education, Power relationsAbstract
One of the emerging challenges in science education involves the sharing of epistemic responsibilities between teachers and students in the knowledge construction processes. In this context, the construct of epistemic agency has been mobilized as a promising proposition among researchers in the field of science education. With the purpose of discussing the meanings of the concept in the area, we address how researchers have interpreted and investigated epistemic agency, focusing on the meanings attributed to the two components of the construct: "agency" and "epistemic." To do this, we seek to position the notion of agency in the broader educational field, considering research that explores relationships between agency as a broader and intersectional construct and learning. In a cohesive manner, we discuss epistemic aspects commonly considered in analyses of epistemic agency. Finally, we discuss the relationships between epistemic agency and power, which seems particularly relevant for advancements in the field, given the already established discussions about the active role of the student in learning. We argue that research on epistemic agency would benefit from a more solid grounding in power theories, which would allow for: i) situating the aspects considered relevant in the analyses, ii) operationalizing concepts from power theories for analysis; iii) linking theoretical propositions about power to notions of science learning used in the field; and iv) advance understanding of transformations in learning contexts.References
Akgun, M., & Sharma, P. (2023). Exploring epistemic agency in students’ problem-solving activities. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 19(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/12970
Alzen, J. L., Edwards, K., Penuel, W. R., Reiser, B. J., Passmore, C., Griesemer, C. D., . . . & Buell, J. Y. (2022). Characterizing relationships between collective enterprise and student epistemic agency in science: A comparative case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(7), 1510-1550. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21841
Banch, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and children, 46(2), 26-29. Recuperado de https://www.michiganseagrant.org/lessons/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/04/The-Many-Levels-of-Inquiry-NSTA-article.pdf
Baptista, M. (2010). Concepção e implementação de actividades de investigação:um estudo com professores de física e química do ensino básico. (Tese de doutorado). Universidade de Lisboa. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/10451/1854
Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2010). We Be Burnin'! Agency, Identity And Science Learning. Journal of The Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903530044
Bell, R., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 7, 30-34. Recuperado de https://cbexapp.noaa.gov/pluginfile.php/34740/mod_resource/content/3/simplifying%20inquiry%20instruction.pdf
Bloome, D., & Green, J. (1982). The Social Contexts of Reading: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Em B. Hutson, Advances in Reading/Language Research. Greenwich, Ct: Jai Press.
Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2005). Discourse Analysis and The Study of Classroom Language and Literacy Events. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Bloome, D., Power-Carter, S., Baker, W., Castanheira, M., Kim, M., & L., R. (2022). Discourse Analysis of Languaging and Literacy Events in Educational Settings: A Microethnographic Perspective. Routledge.
Carlone, H. B., Johnson, A., & Scott, C. M. (2015). Agency Amidst Formidable Structures: How Girls Perform Gender In Science Class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 474–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21224
Carvalho, A. M. (2013). O ensino de Ciências e a proposição de sequências de ensino investigativas. Em A. Carvalho, Ensino de ciências por investigação: condições para implementação em sala de aula. São Paulo, SP: Cengage Learning.
Carvalho, A. M. (2018). Fundamentos Teóricos e Metodológicos do Ensino por Investigação. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 18(3), 765-794.
Carvalho, A. M., Ricardo, E. C., Sasseron, L. H., Abib, M. L., & Pietrocola, M. (2010). Ensino de Física. São Paulo, SP: Cengage Learning.
Cherbow, K. (2023). Responsive instructional design for students' epistemic agency: Documenting episodes of principled improvisation in storyline enactment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(4), 807-846. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21818
Damşa, C. I., Kirschner, P. A., Andriessen, J. E., Erkens, G., & Sins, P. H. (2010). Shared Epistemic Agency: an Empirical Study of an Emergent Construct. Journal of The Learning Sciences, 19(2), 143-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508401003708381
Duschl, R. (2008). Science Education In Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual,Epistemic, And Social Learning Goals. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 268–291.
Engel, D. (2017). O que é Agência Epistêmica, afinal? Veritas, 62(3), 540-565.
Eriksson, I., & Lindberg, V. (2016). Enriching “Learning Activity” With “Epistemic Practices”—Enhancing Students’ Epistemic Agency And Authority. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 26(1), 32432. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v2.32432
Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777-795. https://doi.org/10.1086/448181
González‐Howard, M., & Mcneill, K. L. (2020). Acting With Epistemic Agency: Characterizing Student Critique During Argumentation Discussions. Science Education, 104(6), 953-982. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21592
Kane, J. M. (2015). The Structure-Agency Dialectic In Contested Science Spaces: “Do Earthworms Eat Apples? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 461-473. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21206
Kelly, G. J. (2008). Inquiry, activity and epistemic practice. Em R. D. Grandy (Ed.), Teaching Scientific Inquiry: recommendations for research and implementation. Rotterdam, Holand: Taipei Sense Publishers, 288-291.
Ko, M. M., & Krist, C. (2019). Opening Up Curricula To Redistribute Epistemic Agency: A Framework For Supporting Science Teaching. Science Education, 103(4), 979-1010. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21511
Latour, B. (2013). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Journal of Economic Sociology, 14(2), 73-87.
Manz, E. (2015). Resistance and the Development of Scientific Practice: Designing the Mangle Into Science Instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 33(1), 89-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2014.1000490
Matusov, E., Von Duyke, K., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Mapping Concepts of Agency in Educational Contexts. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 420-446.
Millar, R. (2003). Um Currículo de Ciências Voltado Para Compreensão de Todos. Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 5(3), 146-164. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172003050206
Miller, E. M., & Berland, L. (2018). Addressing The Epistemic Elephant In The Room: Epistemic Agency and The Next Generation Science Standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21459
Miller-Rushing, A., & Hufnagel, E. (2023). Trends in K-12 Teacher Agency Research: A Review of Science Education Research,. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 34(2), 157-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2022.2037875
Motta, A. M., Medeiros, M. F., & Motokane, M. T. (2018). Práticas e Movimentos Epistêmicos na Análise de uma atividade prática Experimental Investigativa. Alexandria Revista de Educação em Ciências e Tecnologia, 11(2), 337-359.
Nieminen, J. H., Tai, J., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2021). Student Agency in Feedback: Beyond The Individual. Assessment And Evaluation In Higher Education, 47(1), 95-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1887080
Odden, T. O., Malthe-Sørenssen, A., & Silvia, D. W. (2022). Using computational essays to foster disciplinary epistemic agency in undergraduate science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(5), 939-977. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21821
Ramos, T. C., Mendonça, P. C., & Mozzer, N. B. (2021). Análisis De La Agencia Epistémica De Los Estudiantes En Un Contexto Argumentativo. Eureka Sobre Enseñanza Y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2021.v18.i2.2102
Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective CognitiveResponsibility for the Advancementof Knowledge. Em B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society. Open Court.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher Levels of Agency for Children in Knowledge Building: A Challenge for the Design of New Knowledge Media. Journal of The Learning Sciences, 1(1),37-68. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0101_3
Silva, M. B., Gerolin, E. C., & Trivelato, S. L. (2018). A Importância da Autonomia dos Estudantes para a Ocorrência de Práticas Epistêmicas no Ensino por Investigação. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 18(3), 905–933. https://doi.org/10.28976/1984-2686rbpec2018183905
Stroupe, D. (2014). Examining Classroom Science Practice Communities: How Teachers and Students Negotiate Epistemic Agency and Learn Science-as-Practice. Science Education, 98(3), 487–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21112
Stroupe, D., Caballero, M. D., & White, P. (2018). Fostering Students’ Epistemic Agency Through The Co-Configuration of Moth Research. Science Education, 102(6), 1176–1200. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21469
Sugarman, J., & Sokol, B. (2012). Human agency and development: an introduction andtheoretical sketch. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(1), 1-14. 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.001
Yang, H., & Gong , Y. F. (2023). Preservice teachers’ epistemic agency during practicums: case studies from Macau. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 36(4), 471-488 https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2023.2239848
Zhang, J., Ian, Y., Yuan, G., & Tao, D. (2022). Epistemic agency for costructuring expansive knowledge‐building practices. Science Education, 106(4), 890-923. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21717
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Thalita Oliveira Carneiro, Ana Paula Souto Silva Teles, Santer Alvares de Matos, Luiz Gustavo Franco
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
IENCI is an Open Access journal, which does not have to pay any charges either for the submission or processing of articles. The journal has adopted the definition of the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI), which states that the users have the right to read, write down, copy, distribute, print, conduct searches and make direct links with the complete texts of the published articles.
The author responsible for the submission represents all the authors of the work and when the article is sent to the journal, guarantees that he has the permission of his/her co-authors to do so. In the same way, he/she provides an assurance that the article does not infringe authors´ rights and that there are no signs of plagiarism in the work. The journal is not responsible for any opinions that are expressed.
All the articles are published with a Creative Commons License Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International. The authors hold the copyright of their works and must be contacted directly if there is any commercial interest in the use of their works.