MODELO DE RECONSTRUÇÃO EDUCACIONAL COMO UM APORTE TEÓRICO E METODOLÓGICO PARA O DESIGN DE AMBIENTES DE ENSINO E APRENDIZAGEM DA CIÊNCIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2020v25n1p262Palabras clave:
Modelo de Reconstrução Educacional, Quadro intermediário, Ferramentas de design, Intervenções educacionais, Ensino de ciênciasResumen
Neste artigo o Modelo de Reconstrução Educacional (MRE) foi apresentado como um aporte teórico e metodológico para o design de ambientes de ensino e aprendizagem da ciência. Para isso, foi necessário elucidar o entendimento sobre as grandes teorias, os quadros intermediários e as ferramentas de design no processo de design de intervenções educacionais. A partir deste entendimento foi feito o aprofundamento teórico do MRE, que resultou na clarificação do seu quadro intermediário. Além disso, o aprofundamento da discussão metodológica do MRE permitiu um entendimento mais claro das relações entre seus três componentes: análise da estrutura do conteúdo, investigações sobre as perspectivas dos estudantes e design e avaliação de ambientes de ensino e aprendizagem. Todas essas discussões contribuíram para que o MRE fosse defendido neste trabalho como um modelo teórico e metodológico frutífero para auxiliar professores e pesquisadores do ensino de ciências no processo de design de intervenções educacionais que tratem de conteúdos científicos.Citas
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813
Chalmers, A. F., & Fiker, R. (1993). O que é ciência afinal?. São Paulo, SP: Brasiliense.
Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., Kattmann, K., Komorek, M., & Parchmann, I. (2012). The Model of Educational Reconstruction – A Framework for Improving Teaching and Learning Science. In D. Jorde & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science Education Research and Practice in Europe: Restropertive and Prospective (pp. 13–38). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-900-8_2
Duit, R. (2006a). La investigación sobre enseñanza de las ciencias. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 11, 741–770.
Duit, R. (2006b). Science Education Research–An Indispensable prerequisite for improving instructional practice. In ESERA Summer School, Braga (pp. 1–18). Recuperado de http://www.esera.org/media/summerschool/esera2006/DUITBR.pdf
Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., Kattmann, U., Komorek, M., & Parchmann, I. (2012). The Model of Educational Reconstruction: A Framework for Improving Teaching and Learning Science. (D. Jorde & J. Dillon, Eds.), Science Education Research and Practice in Europe: Restropertive and Prospective. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Duit, R., Treagust, D. F., & Widodo, A. (2013). Teaching Science for Conceptual Change. International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, (10872), 487–503. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203154472.ch25
El-Hani, C., & Bizzo, N. V. (2002). Formas de construtivismo: Teoria da mudança conceitual e construtivismo contextual. In Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências (pp. 1–25). https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172002040104
Felzmann, D. (2014). Using Metaphorical Models for Describing Glaciers. International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2795–2824. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.936328
Fischler, H. (2011). Didaktik Didaktik —An Appropriate Framework for the Professional Work of Science Teachers SCIENCE TEACHERS ? In The Professional Knowledge Base of Science Teaching (pp. 31–50). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3927-9_3
Howe, K. R., & Berv, J. (2000). Constructing Constructivism, Epistemological and Pedagogical. In D. C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. (pp. 19–40). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
Kattmann, U. (2007). Didaktische Rekonstruktion – eine praktische Theorie. In Theorien in der biologiedidaktischen Forschung. (pp. 93–104). Berlim: Springer Netherlands.
Kattmann, U., Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., & Komorek, M. (1996). Educational Reconstruction – Bringing Together Issues of Scientific Clarification and Students’ Conceptions. In Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST) (p. 19). https://doi.org/Kiel
Kersting, M., Henriksen, E. K., Bøe, M. V., & Angell, C. (2018). General relativity in upper secondary school: design and evaluation of an online learning environment using the model of educational reconstruction. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14, 010130. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010130
Klafki, W. (1995). Didactic analysis as the core of preparation of instruction (Didaktische Analyse als Kern der Unterrichtsvorbereitung). Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 13–30.
Komorek, M., & Kattmann, U. (2008) The model of educational reconstruction. In Mikelskis-seifert, S., Ute, R., Brückmann, M. (Eds.). Four decades of research in science education: from curriculum development to quality improvement (pp. 171-188). Münster/newyork/münchen/berlin: Waxmann.
Labudde, P. (2008) The role of constructivism in science education: yesterday, today and tomorrow. In Mikelskis-seifert, S., Ute, R., Brückmann, M. (Ed.). Four decades of research in science education: from curriculum development to quality improvement (pp. 139-156). Münster/newyork/münchen/berlin: Waxmann.
Matta, A. E. R., Silva, F. P. S., & Boaventura, E. M. (2014). Design-based research ou pesquisa de aplicada de inovação em educação do século xxi. Revista Da FAEEBA – Educação e Contemporaneidade, 23(42), 23–36.
McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting Educational Design Research. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2014). Educational design research. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., p. 1005). Springer Netherlands.
Méheut, M., & Psillos, D. Teaching-learning sequences: Aims and tools for science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 515–535.
Neves, R. F. (2015). Abordagem do conceito célula: uma investigação a partir das contribuições do Modelo de Reconstrução Educacional (MRE). UFRPE. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Niebert, K., & Gropengieber, H. (2014). Understanding the Greenhouse Effect by Embodiment - Analysing and Using Students’ and Scientists’ Conceptual Resources. International Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.763298
Niebert, K., & Gropengiesser, H. (2013). The Model of Educational Reconstruction : A framework for the Design of Theory-based Content Specific Interventions . The example of Climate Change. In Educational design research – Part B: Illustrative cases (pp. 511–531). Enschede, the Netherlands: SLO.
Pereira, A. P. (2012). Distribuição conceitual no ensino de física quântica: uma aproximação sociocultural às teorias de mudança conceitual. [s.l.]. (Tese de doutorado.). Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ensino de Fïsica. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS.
Pereira, A. P. (2017). Um Panorama da Pesquisa Internacional sobre Mudança Conceitual. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 17(1), 215–242.
Phillips, C. D. (2000). Constructivism in Education: Opinions and Second Opinions on Controversial Issues. Ninety-Ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, p. 340.
Pietrocola, M. (2002). A Matemática como estruturante do conhecimento físico. Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física, 19(1), 93-114.
Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167–199.
Plomp, T. (2007). Educational design research: an introduction. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research (p. 130). Shanghai: Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University.
Queiroz, G. R. P. C., & Barbosa-Lima, M. C. A. (2007). Conhecimento Científico, seu Ensino e Aprendizagem: atualidade do construtivismo. Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 13(3), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-73132007000300001
Reinfried, S., Aeschbacher, U., Kienzler, P. M., & Tempelmann, S. (2015). The model of educational reconstruction - a powerful strategy to teach for conceptual developmente in physical geography: the case of water springs. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 24(3), 237–257. https://doi.org/10382046.2015.1034459
Reinfried, S., Mathis, C., & Kattmann, U. (2009). Das Modell der Didaktischen Rekonstruktion. Eine innovative Methode zur fachdidaktischen Erforschung und Entwicklung von Unterricht. Beiträge Zur Lehrerinnen- Und LehrerBildung, 3(27), 404–414.
Riemeier, T., & Gropengieber, H. (2008). On the roots of difficulties in learning about cell division: Process-based analysis of students’ conceptual development in teaching experiments. International Journal of Science Education, 30(7), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701294716
Ruthven, K., Laborde, C., Leach, J., & Tiberghien, A. (2009). Design tools in didactical research: instrumenting the epistemological and cognitive aspects of the design of teaching sequences. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09338513
Sam, A., Niebert, K., Hanson, R., & Twumasi, A. K. (2015). the Model of Educational Reconstruction: Scientists’ and Students’ Conceptual Balances To Improve Teaching of Coordination Chemistry in Higher Education. International Journal of Academic Research and Reflection, 3(7), 1–11.
Sander, E., Jelemenská, P., & Kattmann, U. (2006). Towards a better understanding of ecology, Journal of Biological Education, 40(3), 119-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2006.9656028
Sarmento, A. C. H., Muniz, C. R. R., Silva, N. R., Pereira, V. A., Santana, M. A. S., Sá, T. S., & El-Hani, C. N. (2013). Investigando princípios de Design de una sequência didáctica sobre metabolismo energético. Ciência & Educação, 19(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-73132013000300006
Shattuck, J., & Anderson, T. (2013). Using a Design-Based Research Study to Identify Principles for Training Instructors to Teach Online. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(5), 186–210.
Stavrou, D. (2015). Educational reconstruction of nonlinear systems: transforming the science content into a content into a content for instruction. In ESERA (pp. 785–791).
Van den Akker, J. (1999). Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. (J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp, Eds.), Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7
Van Dijk, E. M., & Kattmann, U. (2007). A research model for the study of science teachers’ PCK and improving teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 885–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.002
Viiri, J., & Savinainen, A. (2008). Teaching-learning sequences: A comparison of learning demand analysis and educational reconstruction. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 2(2), 80–86. https://doi.org/1870-9095
Werneck, V. R. (2006). Sobre o processo de construção do conhecimento: O papel do ensino e da pesquisa. Ensaio Avaliação em Políticas Públicas em Educação, 14(51), 173–96. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362006000200003
Zabala, A. (1998). A prática educativa: como ensinar. Porto Alegre, RS: Artmed.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
La IENCI es una revista de acceso libre (Open Access) y no hay cobro de ninguna tasa ya sea por el envío o procesamiento de los artículos. La revista adopta la definición de la Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI), es decir, los usuarios tienen el derecho de leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar y hacer links directos a los textos completos de los artículos publicados en esta revista.
El autor responsable por el envío representa a todos los autores del trabajo y, al enviar este artículo para su publicación en la revista está garantizando que posee el permiso de todos para hacerlo. De igual manera, garantiza que el artículo no viola los derechos de autor y que no hay plagio en lugar alguno del trabajo. La revista no se responsabiliza de las opiniones emitidas en los artículos.
Todos los artículos de publican con la licencia Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0). Los autores mantienen sus derechos de autor sobre sus producciones y deben ser contactados directamente en el caso de que hubiera interés en el uso comercial de su obra.