MODELO DE RECONSTRUÇÃO EDUCACIONAL COMO UM APORTE TEÓRICO E METODOLÓGICO PARA O DESIGN DE AMBIENTES DE ENSINO E APRENDIZAGEM DA CIÊNCIA

Autores/as

  • Michelle Garcia da Silva Universidade Estadual da Paraíba
  • Helaine Sivini Ferreira Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2020v25n1p262

Palabras clave:

Modelo de Reconstrução Educacional, Quadro intermediário, Ferramentas de design, Intervenções educacionais, Ensino de ciências

Resumen

Neste artigo o Modelo de Reconstrução Educacional (MRE) foi apresentado como um aporte teórico e metodológico para o design de ambientes de ensino e aprendizagem da ciência. Para isso, foi necessário elucidar o entendimento sobre as grandes teorias, os quadros intermediários e as ferramentas de design no processo de design de intervenções educacionais. A partir deste entendimento foi feito o aprofundamento teórico do MRE, que resultou na clarificação do seu quadro intermediário. Além disso, o aprofundamento da discussão metodológica do MRE permitiu um entendimento mais claro das relações entre seus três componentes: análise da estrutura do conteúdo, investigações sobre as perspectivas dos estudantes e design e avaliação de ambientes de ensino e aprendizagem. Todas essas discussões contribuíram para que o MRE fosse defendido neste trabalho como um modelo teórico e metodológico frutífero para auxiliar professores e pesquisadores do ensino de ciências no processo de design de intervenções educacionais que tratem de conteúdos científicos.

Biografía del autor/a

Michelle Garcia da Silva, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba

Departamento de biologia, área de ensino

Citas

Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813

Chalmers, A. F., & Fiker, R. (1993). O que é ciência afinal?. São Paulo, SP: Brasiliense.

Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., Kattmann, K., Komorek, M., & Parchmann, I. (2012). The Model of Educational Reconstruction – A Framework for Improving Teaching and Learning Science. In D. Jorde & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science Education Research and Practice in Europe: Restropertive and Prospective (pp. 13–38). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-900-8_2

Duit, R. (2006a). La investigación sobre enseñanza de las ciencias. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 11, 741–770.

Duit, R. (2006b). Science Education Research–An Indispensable prerequisite for improving instructional practice. In ESERA Summer School, Braga (pp. 1–18). Recuperado de http://www.esera.org/media/summerschool/esera2006/DUITBR.pdf

Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., Kattmann, U., Komorek, M., & Parchmann, I. (2012). The Model of Educational Reconstruction: A Framework for Improving Teaching and Learning Science. (D. Jorde & J. Dillon, Eds.), Science Education Research and Practice in Europe: Restropertive and Prospective. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Duit, R., Treagust, D. F., & Widodo, A. (2013). Teaching Science for Conceptual Change. International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, (10872), 487–503. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203154472.ch25

El-Hani, C., & Bizzo, N. V. (2002). Formas de construtivismo: Teoria da mudança conceitual e construtivismo contextual. In Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências (pp. 1–25). https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172002040104

Felzmann, D. (2014). Using Metaphorical Models for Describing Glaciers. International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2795–2824. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.936328

Fischler, H. (2011). Didaktik Didaktik —An Appropriate Framework for the Professional Work of Science Teachers SCIENCE TEACHERS ? In The Professional Knowledge Base of Science Teaching (pp. 31–50). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3927-9_3

Howe, K. R., & Berv, J. (2000). Constructing Constructivism, Epistemological and Pedagogical. In D. C. Phillips (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. (pp. 19–40). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.

Kattmann, U. (2007). Didaktische Rekonstruktion – eine praktische Theorie. In Theorien in der biologiedidaktischen Forschung. (pp. 93–104). Berlim: Springer Netherlands.

Kattmann, U., Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., & Komorek, M. (1996). Educational Reconstruction – Bringing Together Issues of Scientific Clarification and Students’ Conceptions. In Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST) (p. 19). https://doi.org/Kiel

Kersting, M., Henriksen, E. K., Bøe, M. V., & Angell, C. (2018). General relativity in upper secondary school: design and evaluation of an online learning environment using the model of educational reconstruction. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14, 010130. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010130

Klafki, W. (1995). Didactic analysis as the core of preparation of instruction (Didaktische Analyse als Kern der Unterrichtsvorbereitung). Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(1), 13–30.

Komorek, M., & Kattmann, U. (2008) The model of educational reconstruction. In Mikelskis-seifert, S., Ute, R., Brückmann, M. (Eds.). Four decades of research in science education: from curriculum development to quality improvement (pp. 171-188). Münster/newyork/münchen/berlin: Waxmann.

Labudde, P. (2008) The role of constructivism in science education: yesterday, today and tomorrow. In Mikelskis-seifert, S., Ute, R., Brückmann, M. (Ed.). Four decades of research in science education: from curriculum development to quality improvement (pp. 139-156). Münster/newyork/münchen/berlin: Waxmann.

Matta, A. E. R., Silva, F. P. S., & Boaventura, E. M. (2014). Design-based research ou pesquisa de aplicada de inovação em educação do século xxi. Revista Da FAEEBA – Educação e Contemporaneidade, 23(42), 23–36.

McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting Educational Design Research. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2014). Educational design research. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., p. 1005). Springer Netherlands.

Méheut, M., & Psillos, D. Teaching-learning sequences: Aims and tools for science education research. International Journal of Science Education, 26(5), 515–535.

Neves, R. F. (2015). Abordagem do conceito célula: uma investigação a partir das contribuições do Modelo de Reconstrução Educacional (MRE). UFRPE. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Niebert, K., & Gropengieber, H. (2014). Understanding the Greenhouse Effect by Embodiment - Analysing and Using Students’ and Scientists’ Conceptual Resources. International Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.763298

Niebert, K., & Gropengiesser, H. (2013). The Model of Educational Reconstruction : A framework for the Design of Theory-based Content Specific Interventions . The example of Climate Change. In Educational design research – Part B: Illustrative cases (pp. 511–531). Enschede, the Netherlands: SLO.

Pereira, A. P. (2012). Distribuição conceitual no ensino de física quântica: uma aproximação sociocultural às teorias de mudança conceitual. [s.l.]. (Tese de doutorado.). Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ensino de Fïsica. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS.

Pereira, A. P. (2017). Um Panorama da Pesquisa Internacional sobre Mudança Conceitual. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 17(1), 215–242.

Phillips, C. D. (2000). Constructivism in Education: Opinions and Second Opinions on Controversial Issues. Ninety-Ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, p. 340.

Pietrocola, M. (2002). A Matemática como estruturante do conhecimento físico. Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física, 19(1), 93-114.

Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167–199.

Plomp, T. (2007). Educational design research: an introduction. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research (p. 130). Shanghai: Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University.

Queiroz, G. R. P. C., & Barbosa-Lima, M. C. A. (2007). Conhecimento Científico, seu Ensino e Aprendizagem: atualidade do construtivismo. Ciência & Educação (Bauru), 13(3), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-73132007000300001

Reinfried, S., Aeschbacher, U., Kienzler, P. M., & Tempelmann, S. (2015). The model of educational reconstruction - a powerful strategy to teach for conceptual developmente in physical geography: the case of water springs. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 24(3), 237–257. https://doi.org/10382046.2015.1034459

Reinfried, S., Mathis, C., & Kattmann, U. (2009). Das Modell der Didaktischen Rekonstruktion. Eine innovative Methode zur fachdidaktischen Erforschung und Entwicklung von Unterricht. Beiträge Zur Lehrerinnen- Und LehrerBildung, 3(27), 404–414.

Riemeier, T., & Gropengieber, H. (2008). On the roots of difficulties in learning about cell division: Process-based analysis of students’ conceptual development in teaching experiments. International Journal of Science Education, 30(7), 923–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701294716

Ruthven, K., Laborde, C., Leach, J., & Tiberghien, A. (2009). Design tools in didactical research: instrumenting the epistemological and cognitive aspects of the design of teaching sequences. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09338513

Sam, A., Niebert, K., Hanson, R., & Twumasi, A. K. (2015). the Model of Educational Reconstruction: Scientists’ and Students’ Conceptual Balances To Improve Teaching of Coordination Chemistry in Higher Education. International Journal of Academic Research and Reflection, 3(7), 1–11.

Sander, E., Jelemenská, P., & Kattmann, U. (2006). Towards a better understanding of ecology, Journal of Biological Education, 40(3), 119-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2006.9656028

Sarmento, A. C. H., Muniz, C. R. R., Silva, N. R., Pereira, V. A., Santana, M. A. S., Sá, T. S., & El-Hani, C. N. (2013). Investigando princípios de Design de una sequência didáctica sobre metabolismo energético. Ciência & Educação, 19(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-73132013000300006

Shattuck, J., & Anderson, T. (2013). Using a Design-Based Research Study to Identify Principles for Training Instructors to Teach Online. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(5), 186–210.

Stavrou, D. (2015). Educational reconstruction of nonlinear systems: transforming the science content into a content into a content for instruction. In ESERA (pp. 785–791).

Van den Akker, J. (1999). Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. (J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp, Eds.), Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7

Van Dijk, E. M., & Kattmann, U. (2007). A research model for the study of science teachers’ PCK and improving teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(6), 885–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.002

Viiri, J., & Savinainen, A. (2008). Teaching-learning sequences: A comparison of learning demand analysis and educational reconstruction. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 2(2), 80–86. https://doi.org/1870-9095

Werneck, V. R. (2006). Sobre o processo de construção do conhecimento: O papel do ensino e da pesquisa. Ensaio Avaliação em Políticas Públicas em Educação, 14(51), 173–96. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362006000200003

Zabala, A. (1998). A prática educativa: como ensinar. Porto Alegre, RS: Artmed.

Publicado

2020-05-01

Cómo citar

Silva, M. G. da, & Ferreira, H. S. (2020). MODELO DE RECONSTRUÇÃO EDUCACIONAL COMO UM APORTE TEÓRICO E METODOLÓGICO PARA O DESIGN DE AMBIENTES DE ENSINO E APRENDIZAGEM DA CIÊNCIA. Investigaciones En Enseñanza De Las Ciencias, 25(1), 262–281. https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2020v25n1p262