A Possible definition of metacognition for the teaching of sciences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2020v25n1p384Keywords:
Metacognition, epistemological obstacles, didactics of biologyAbstract
There is consensus in the academic community that metacognition influences the learning of subjects, as well as their constitution as critical citizens. However, since the areas that investigate this phenomenon are diverse, it is difficult to have a consensual characterization of it. The objective of this article is to present a possible definition of this construct that is useful for the construction of science activities. From research in science education, and in particular biology, we will present concrete examples related to the reading of scientific texts, problem solving and epistemological obstacles.References
Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2007). Predators of knowledge construction: Interpreting students' metacognition in an amusement park physics program. Science Education, 91(2), 298-320.
Arndt, S. (2015). Metacognición y reflexión. Experiencias metacognitivas en el nivel inicial. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Aique.
Astolfi, J. P. (1994). El trabajo didáctico de los obstáculos, en el corazón de los aprendizajes científicos. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 12(2), 206-216.
Astolfi, J. P. (1999a). El tratamiento didáctico de los obstáculos epistemológicos. Revista Educación y Pedagogía, 11(25), 151-171.
Astolfi, J. P. (1999b). El "error", un medio para enseñar. Sevilla, España: Díada.
Astolfi, J. P. (2003). Aprender en la escuela (2a ed.). Santiago, Chile: Comunicaciones Noreste Ltds.
Baker, L., & Cerro, L. (2000). Assessing Metacognition in Children and Adults. En G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.). Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition (pp. 99-145). Nebraska, EE.UU.: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
Ben-David, A., & Orion, N. (2013). Teachers’ voices on integrating metacognition into science education. International Journal of Science Education, 35(18), 3161-3193.
Beran, M., Coutinho, M., Couchman, J., Boomer, J., Washburn, D., & Smith, D. (2009). Metacognition in animals. En C. Larson (Ed.). Metacognition: New reaserch developments (pp. 23-41). New York, EE.UU.: Nova Science Publishers.
Blank, L. (2000). A metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for student understanding?. Science Education, 84(4), 486-506.
Briñol, P., & DeMarree, K. (2012). Social Metacognition Thinking About Thinking in Social Psychology. En P. Briñol, & K. DeMarree (Eds.). Social Metacognition (pp. 1-18). New York, EE.UU.: Psychology Press.
Brown, A. (1977). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. En R. Glaser (Ed.). Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 77-165). Hillsdale, Michigan: Erlbaum.
Campanario, J., Cuerva, J., Moya, A., & Gutiérrez, J. (1998). La metacognición y el aprendizaje de las ciencias. En E. Banet, & A. De Pro (Coords.). Investigación e Innovación en la Enseñanza de las Ciencias (pp. 36-44). España: DM.
Chan, C. (2012). Co-regulation of learning in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a discussion. Metacognition and learning, 7(1), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-012-9086-z
Chiu, M. M., & Kuo, S. W. (2009). Social metacognition in groups: benefits, difficulties, learning and teaching. En C. Larson (Ed.). Metacognition: New reaserch developments (pp. 116-136). New York, EE.UU.: Nova Science Publishers.
Corrêa, N., Passos, M., & Arruda, S. (2018). Perfil metacognitivo (parte II): Aplicação de instrumento de análise. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, 23(1), 230-244.
Correa Zamora, M., Castro Rubilar, F., & Lira Ramos, H. (2004). Estudio descriptivo de las estrategias cognitivas y metacognitivas de los alumnos y alumnas de primer año de Pedagogía en enseñanza media de la universidad del Bío-Bío. Theoria, 13(1), 103-110
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2002). Orígenes de la especificidad de dominio: la evolución de la organización funcional. En L. Hirschfeld, & S. Gelman (Comps.). Cartografía de la mente: la especificidad de dominio en la cognición y en la cultura (pp.132-171). Barcelona, España: Gedisa.
Czernikier, A., Lukin, J., Pedetta, S., Kohen, M., & Pérez, G. (2016). Estereotipos al descubierto. Una propuesta didáctica para problematizar lo masculino y lo femenino en el aula. Revista Bio-grafía, Escritos sobre la Biología y su Enseñanza, 9(16), 168-176. https://doi.org/10.17227/20271034.vol.9num.16bio-grafia169.176
Davidson, J., Deuser, R., & Sternberg, R. (1994). The Role of Metacognition in Problem Solving. En J. Metcalfe, & A. Shimamura (Eds). Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 207-226). Massachusetts, EE.UU.: The MIT Press.
de la Fuente, J., Zapata, L., Martínez-Vicente, J., Sander, P., & Putwain, D. (2015). Personal Self-regulation, Self-regulated Learning and Coping Strategies, in University Context with Stress. En A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.). Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends. A Profile of the Current State-Of-The-Art (pp. 223-255). Suiza: Springer.
DiDonato, N. (2013). Effective self-and co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: An analysis of how students regulate problem solving of authentic interdisciplinary tasks. Instructional science, 41(1), 25-47.
Dye, K., & Stanton, J. (2017). Metacognition in Upper-Division Biology Students: Awareness Does Not Always Lead to Control. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 16(2), 1-14.
Efklides, A. (2006). Metacognition and affect: What can metacognitive experiences tell us about the learning process?. Educational Research Review, 1(1), 3-14.
Efklides, A. (2009). The new look in metacognition: from individual to social, from cognitive to affective. En C. Larson (Ed.). Metaconition: New reaserch developments (pp. 137-151). New York, EE.UU.: Nova Science Publishers.
Eldar, O., & Miedijensky, S. (2015). Designing a Metacognitive Approach to the Professional Development of Experienced Science Teachers. En A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.). Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends. A Profile of the Current State-Of-The-Art (pp. 299-319). Suiza: Springer.
Evans, E., & Rosengren, K. (2018). Cognitive biases or cognitive bridges? En K. Kampourakis (Ed.). Teaching Biology in Schools (pp. 9-21). New York, EE.UU.: Routledge.
Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive—Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
Fletcher, L., & Carruthers, P. (2012). Metacognition and reasoning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1594), 1366-1378.
Ford, C., & Yore, L .(2012). Toward convergence of critical thinking, metacognition, and reflection: illustrations from natural and social science, teacher education and classroom practice. En A. Zohar, & Y. Dori (Eds.). Metacognition in Science Education. Trends in Current Research (pp. 251-271). New York, EE.UU.: Springer.
García Carmona, A. (2012). ¿Qué he comprendido? ¿Qué sigo sin entender?: promoviendo la autorreflexión en clase de ciencias. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 9(2), 231-240.
García, J. E. (1998). Hacia una teoría alternativa sobre los contenidos escolares. Sevilla, España: Díada.
Gaskins, I., & Elliot, T. (2005). Como enseñar estrategias cognitivas en la escuela. El manual Benchmark para docentes. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós.
Gelman, S., & Legare, C. (2011). Concepts and folk theories. Annual review of anthropology, 40, 379-398. https://dx.doi.org/10.1146%2Fannurev-anthro-081309-145822
Gómez Crespo, M. A. (2017). ¿Por qué enseño como enseño? Tres actividades para aprender Ciencias. Madrid, España: Morata.
González de Requena Farré, J. (2010). Para una reconstrucción genealógica y epistemológica del concepto de metacognición. Revista de Psicología, 19(1), 129-153.
González Galli, L. (2011). Obstáculos para el aprendizaje del modelo de evolución por selección natural (Tesis doctoral). Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Recuperado en:
https://bibliotecadigital.exactas.uba.ar/collection/tesis/document/tesis_n4961_GonzalezGalli
González Galli, L. (2019). Permitido decir 'para': critica de la perspectiva tradicional frente al problema de la teleologia en la ensenanza de la biología. Revista Científica, 34. https://doi.org/10.14483/23448350.13710
González Galli, L., & Meinardi, E. (2015). Obstáculos para el aprendizaje del modelo de evolución por selección natural, en estudiantes de escuela secundaria de Argentina. Ciência & Educação, 21(1), 101-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320150010007
González Galli, L., & Meinardi, E. (2016). Obstáculos para el aprendizaje del modelo de evolución por selección natural. En N. Cuvi; E. Sevilla; R. Ruíz, & M. Puig-Samper (Eds.). Evolucionismo en América y Europa (pp. 463-476). Ecuador: Centro Publicaciones PUCE.
González Galli, L., & Meinardi, E. (2017). Obstáculos para el aprendizaje del modelo de evolución por selección natural en estudiantes universitarios de biología. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 14(3), 435-449.
Gourgey, A. (2001). Metacognition in basic skills instruction. En Hartman, H. (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction. Theory, research and practice (pp. 17-32). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Grau, V., & Whitebread, D. (2012). Self and social regulation of learning during collaborative activities in the classroom: The interplay of individual and group cognition. Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 401-412.
Grotzer, T., & Mittlefehldt, S. (2012). The role of metacognition in stundents' understanding and transfer of explanatory structures in science. En A. Zohar, & Y. Dori (Eds.). Metacognition in Science Education. Trends in Current Research (pp. 79-99). New York, EE.UU.: Springer
Hartman, H. (2001a). Developing students' metacognitive knowledge and skills. En H. Hartman (Ed.). Metacognition in learning and instruction. Theory, research and practice (pp. 33-68). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer
Hartman, H. (2001b). Teaching metacognitively. En H. Hartman (Ed.). Metacognition in learning and instruction. Theory, research and practice (pp. 149-164). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Hartman, H. (2001c). Metacognition in science teaching and learning. En H. Hartman (Ed.). Metacognition in learning and instruction. Theory, research and practice (pp. 173-201). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B., & Baddeley, A. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 174-180.
Hogan, M., Dwyer, C., Harney, O., Noone, C., & Conway, R. (2015). Metacognitive Skill Development and Applied Systems Science: A Framework of Metacognitive Skills, Self-regulatory Functions and Real-World Applications. En A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.). Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends. A Profile of the Current State-Of-The-Art (pp. 75-106). Suiza: Springer.
Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Socially-shared metacognition in peer learning? Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 1, 147-178.
Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. (2011). Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem-solving processes. Learning and instruction, 21(3), 379-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.002
Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 350-374.
Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., Koivuniemi, M., & Järvenoja, H. (2015). Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(1), 125-142.
Johsua, S., & Dupin, J. (2005). Introducción a la didáctica de las ciencias y la matemática. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Colihue.
Jorba, J., & Casellas, E. (1997). La regulación y la autorregulación de los aprendizajes. Madrid, España: Editorial Síntesis.
Jost, J., Kruglanski, A., & Nelson, T. (1998). Social metacognition: An expansionist review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(2), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0202_6
Justi, R., & Maia, P. (2009). Metacognição em modelagem desenvolvendo conhecimentos sobre ciência. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, Número Extra VIII Congreso Internacional sobre Investigación en Didáctica de las Ciencias, Barcelona, España, 534-537.
Kampourakis, K. (2014). Understanding Evolution. New York, EE.UU.: Cambridge University Press.
Klimenko, O., & Alvares, J. L. (2009). Aprender cómo aprendo: la enseñanza de estrategias metacognitivas. Educación y Educadores, 12(2), 11-28.
Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive Development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(5), pp. 178-181.
Kuhn, D. (2012). Enseñar a pensar. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Amorrortu.
Larson, C. (2009). Metaconition: New reaserch developments. New York, EE.UU.: Nova Science Publishers.
Ley Fuentes, M. (2014). El Aprendizaje Basado en la Resolución de Problemas y su efectividad en el Desarrollo de la Metacognición. Educatio Siglo XXI, 32(3), 211-230.
Malmberg, J., Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Panadero, E. (2015). Promoting socially shared regulation of learning in CSCL: Progress of socially shared regulation among high-and low-performing groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 562-572.
Martí, E. (1995). Metacognición: entre la fascinación y el desencanto. Infancia y aprendizaje, 18(72), 9-32.
Maturano, C., Macías, A., & Soliveres, M. (2002). Estrategias cognitivas y metacognitivas en la comprensión de un texto de Ciencias. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 20(3), 415-425.
Maximo Pereira, M., & Andrade, V. (2012). Autoavaliação como estratégia para o desenvolvimento da metacognição em aulas de ciências. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, 17(3), 663-674.
Mayer, R. (2001). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. En H. Hartman (Ed.). Metacognition in learning and instruction. Theory, research and practice (pp. 87-101). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
McKeown, M., & Beck, I. (2009). The Role of Metacognition in Understanding and Supporting Reading Comprehension. En D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.). Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 7-25). New York, EE.UU.: Routledge.
Monereo, C., Castelló, M., Clariana, M., Palma, M., & Pérez, M. (2012). Estrategias de enseñanza y aprendizaje (2° ed). Barcelona, España: Grao.
Moulin, C. (2002). Sense and sensitivity: Metacognition in Alzheimer's disease. Applied metacognition, 197-223.
Muria Vila, I. (1994). La enseñanza de las estrategias de aprendizaje y las habilidades metacognitivas. Perfiles Educativos, 65, 1-11.
Norris, S., & Phillips, L. (2012). Reading Science: How a naive view of reading hinders so much else. En A. Zohar, & Y. Dori, (Eds.). Metacognition in Science Education. Trends in Current Research (pp. 37-56). New York, EE.UU.: Springer.
Núñez, J., Solano, P., González-Pienda, J., & Rosário, P. (2006). Evaluación de los procesos de autorregulación mediante autoinforme. Psicothema, 18(3), 353-358.
Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2014). ¿Cómo autorregulan nuestros alumnos? Revisión del modelo cíclico de Zimmerman sobre autorregulación del aprendizaje. Anales de Psicología, 30(2), 450-462.
Panadero, E., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Socially shared regulation of learning: A review. European Psychologist, 20, 190-203.
Peña-Ayala (2015). Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends. A Profile of the Current State-Of-The-Art. Suiza: Springer.
Peterfalvi, B. (2001). Identificación de los obstáculos por parte de los alumnos. En A. Camilloni (Comp.). Los obstáculos epistemológicos en la enseñanza (pp. 127-168). Barcelona, España: Gedisa.
Pérez, G., & González Galli, L. (no prelo).
Pérez, G., Gómez Galindo, A., & González Galli, L. (2017). Estrategias metacognitivas usadas por alumnos en la resolución de problemas de biología evolutiva. En Actas del IX Congreso Iberoamericano de Educación Científica y del I Seminario de Inclusión Educativa y Sociodigital (CIEDUC 2017). Mendoza, Argentina. Recuperado de:
http://www.cieduc.org/2017/LibroCIEDUC2017-Volumen1.pdf
Pérez G., Gómez Galindo, A., & González Galli, L. (2018). Enseñanza de la evolución: fundamentos para el diseño de una propuesta didáctica basada en la modelización y la metacognición sobre los obstáculos epistemológicos. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 15(2), 2102. http://dx.doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2018.v15.i2.2102
Pintó, R., Aliberas, J., & Gómez, R. (1996). Tres enfoques de la investigación sobre concepciones alternativas. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 14(2), 221-232.
Pintrich, P. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing. Theory into practice, 41(4), 219-225.
Pintrich, P., Wolters, C., & Baxter, G. (2000). Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning. En G. Schraw, & J. Impara (Eds.). Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition (pp. 43-97). Nebraska, EE.UU.: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
Pozo, J. (2016) Aprender en tiempos revueltos. La nueva ciencia del aprendizaje. Madrid, España: Alianza.
Pressley, M. (2000). Development of Grounded Theories of Complex Cognitive Processing: Exhaustive Withinand Between-Study Analyses of Think-Aloud Data. En G. Schraw, & J. Impara (Eds.). Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition (pp. 261-296). Nebraska, EE.UU.: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
Proust, J. (2013). The Philosophy of Metacognition. Mental Agency and Self-Awareness. Ney York, EE.UU.: Oxford University Press.
Ramírez, J., & Onrubia, J. (2016). La importancia de los procesos de regulación compartida en CSCL: rasgos teóricos y empíricos para su estudio. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 70(1), 29-46.
Ramos, I., & Verde, R. (2006). De la reflexión a la corregulación en el aprendizaje. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 38(2), 1-7.
Ritchhart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2014). Hacer visible el pensamiento. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós.
Rogat, T., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in collaborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regulation and group processes. Cognition and Instruction, 29 (4), 375-415.
Rosa, C., & Ghiggi, C. (2018). Resolução de problemas em física envolvendo estratégias metacognitivas: análise de propostas didácticas. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, 23(3), 30-59.
Saab, N., van Joolingen, W., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2012). Support of the collaborative inquiry learning process: influence of support on task and team regulation. Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 7-23.
Saldaña, D., & Aguilera, A. (2003). La evaluación de los procesos metacognitivos: estrategias y problemática actuales. Estudios de Psicología, 24(2), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1174/021093903765762901
Salomon, G. (1993). Cogniciones distribuidas. Consideraciones psicológicas y educativas. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Amorrortu.
Schraw, G. (2001). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. En H. Hartman (Ed.). Metacognition in learning and instruction. Theory, research and practice (pp. 3-16). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer
Schraw, G., e Impara, J. (2000). Issues in the Measurement of Metacognition. Nebraska, EE.UU.: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
Schraw, G., & Gutierrez, A. (2015). Metacognitive Strategy Instruction that Highlights the Role of Monitoring and Control Processes. En A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.). Metacognition: Fundaments, Applications, and Trends. A Profile of the Current State-Of-The-Art (pp. 3-16). Suiza: Springer.
Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational psychology review, 7(4), 351-371.
Schraw, G., Olafson, L., Weibel, M., & Sewing, D. (2012). Metacognitive Knowledge and Field-based science learning in outdoor enviromental education program. En A. Zohar, & Y. Dori (Eds.). Metacognition in Science Education. Trends in Current Research (pp. 57-77). New York, EE.UU.: Springer.
Siegel, M. (2012). Filling in the distance between us: Group metacognition during problem solving in a secondary education course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(3), 325-341.
Soto Lombana, C. (2002). Metacognición: Cambio conceptual y enseñanza de las ciencias. Bogotá, Colombia: Cooperativa Editorial Magisterio.
Sternberg, R. (2001). Metacognition, abilities and developing expertise: What makes an expert student?. En H. Hartman (Ed.). Metacognition in learning and instruction. Theory, research and practice (pp. 173-201). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Swanson, H. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of educational psychology, 82(2), 306-314.
Tamayo Alzate, O. (2006). La metacognición en los modelos para la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de las ciencias. En A. Martínez Boom (Ed.). Los bordes de la pedagogía: del modelo a la ruptura (pp. 275-306). Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional.
Tamayo Alzate, O., Zona López, J., & Loaiza Zuluaga, Y. (2017). La metacognición como constituyente del pensamiento crítico en el aula de ciencias. Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis, Número extraordinario, 1031-1036
Thompson, L., & Cohen, T. (2012). Metacognition in Teams and Organizations. En P. Briñol, & K. DeMarree (Eds.). Social Metacognition (pp. 283-302). Ney York, EE.UU.: Psychology Press.
Tobias, S., & Everson, H. (2009). The Importance of Knowing What You Know. A Knowledge Monitoring Framework for Studying Metacognition in Education. En D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.). Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 107-127). New York, EE.UU.: Routledge.
Vázquez-Alonso, A., & Manassero-Mas, A. (2018). Más allá de la comprensión científica: educación científica para desarrollar el pensamiento. Revista Electrónica de Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 17(2), 309-336.
Veenman, M. (2012). Metacognition in Science Education: Definitions, Constituents and Their Intrincate Relation with Cognition. En A. Zohar, & Y. Dori (Eds.). Metacognition in Science Education. Trends in Current Research (pp. 21-36). New York, EE.UU.: Springer.
Veenman, M., Elshout, J., & Meijer, J. (1997). The generality vs domain-specificity of metacognitive skills in novice learning across domains. Learning and instruction, 7(2), 187-209.
Velayutham, S., Aldridge, J., & Fraser, B. (2011). Development and validation of an instrument to measure Students’ Motivation and Self-Regulation in Science Learning. International Journal of Science Education, 33(15), 2159-2179.
Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 128-143.
Whitebread, D., & Grau Cárdenas, V. (2012). Self-regulated learning and conceptual devolpment in young children: the development of biological understanding. En A. Zohar & Y. Dori (Eds.). Metacognition in Science Education. Trends in Current Research (pp. 101-132). New York, EE.UU: Springer.
White, B., Frederiksen, J., & Collins, A. (2009). The Interplay of Scientific Inquiry and Metacognition. More than a Marriage of Convenience. En D. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.). Handbook of Metacognition in Education (pp. 175-205). New York, EE.UU.: Routledge.
Zimmermann, E. (2000). The Structure and Development of Science Teachers' Pedagogical Models: Implications for Teacher Education. En J. Gilbert y C. Boulter (Eds.). Developing Models in Science Education (pp. 325-341). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Zohar, A. (2012). Explicit teaching of metastrategic knowledge: definitions, student's learning, and teachers' professional development. En A. Zohar, & Y. Dori (Eds.). Metacognition in Science Education. Trends in Current Research (pp. 197-223). New York, EE.UU.: Springer.
Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2013). A review of research on metacognition in science education: current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121-169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.847261
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
IENCI is an Open Access journal, which does not have to pay any charges either for the submission or processing of articles. The journal has adopted the definition of the Budapest Open Access Initiative (BOAI), which states that the users have the right to read, write down, copy, distribute, print, conduct searches and make direct links with the complete texts of the published articles.
The author responsible for the submission represents all the authors of the work and when the article is sent to the journal, guarantees that he has the permission of his/her co-authors to do so. In the same way, he/she provides an assurance that the article does not infringe authors´ rights and that there are no signs of plagiarism in the work. The journal is not responsible for any opinions that are expressed.
All the articles are published with a Creative Commons License Attribution Non-commercial 4.0 International. The authors hold the copyright of their works and must be contacted directly if there is any commercial interest in the use of their works.
