ROTAS DE TRANSIÇÃO MODAL E O ENSINO DE REPRESENTAÇÕES ENVOLVIDAS NO MODELO CINÉTICO MOLECULAR

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2019v24n3p74

Palabras clave:

ensino de Química, multimodalidade, representação multimodal, rota de transição modal

Resumen

Neste trabalho, nos baseamos em estudos envolvendo múltiplas representações e representações multimodais e investigamos aulas sobre o modelo cinético molecular, a partir de episódios de interação entre uma professora de Química e seus estudantes de Ensino Médio, os quais foram registrados em vídeo e analisados por meio de técnicas de análise microgenética. Nas aulas, os estudantes foram convidados a propor representações para três fenômenos observados por meio de experimentos. A professora conduziu as aulas seguintes em torno da avaliação, negociação e aperfeiçoamento das representações. Percebemos, ao longo da atividade, que a comunicação teve caráter multimodal e a professora representou o mesmo fenômeno por meio da fala, desenho, gestos e aparatos experimentais. A análise da performance e da interação multimodal nos permitiu caracterizar rotas de transição entre os modos semióticos. Essas transições se mostraram importantes para a construção de significados, proporcionando algumas restrições produtivas. A performance da professora possibilitou perceber potencialidades e limitações envolvidas no uso da comunicação multimodal e das múltiplas representações.

Biografía del autor/a

Ana Luiza de Quadros, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)

Doutora em Educação pela UFMG, Po-s doutorada pela USP. Professora de Ensino de Química, no Departamento de Química/ ICEx, da UFMG

Citas

Abels, S. (2016). The role of gestures in a teacher-student-discourse about atoms. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(3), 618-628. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00026F

Andrade, J. M., & Saraiva, M. J. (2012). Múltiplas representações: um contributo para a aprendizagem do conceito de função. Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación em Matemática Educativa, 15(2), 137-169. Recuperado de http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/relime/v15n2/v15n2a2.pdf

Anthony, R. J., Tippett, C. D., & Yore, L. D. (2010). Pacific CRYSTAL Project: Explicit Literacy Instruction Embedded in Middle School Science Classrooms. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9156-7

Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B., & Silberstein, J. (1987). Students’ visualisation of a chemical reaction. Education in Chemistry, 24(4), 117-120.

Chue, S., Lee, Y., & Tan, K. C. D. (2015). Iconic Gestures as Undervalued Representations during Science Teaching. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1021554

Cunha, A. (1986). Dicionário etimológico Nova fronteira da língua portuguesa. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: Nova Fronteira.

Danielsson, K. (2016). Modes and meaning in the classroom – The role of different semiotic resources to convey meaning in science classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 35, pp. 88-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2016.07.005

Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common Knowledge: the development of understanding in the classroom. London, England: Routledge.

Gilbert, J. K. (2013). Representations and Models: Aspects of Scientific Literacy. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing Representations to Learn in Science (pp. 193-219). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Gillies, R. M., & Baffour, B. (2017). The Effects of Teacher-Introduced Multimodal Representations and Discourse on Students' Task Engagement and Scientific Language during Cooperative, Inquiry-Based Science. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 45(4), 493-513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9414-4

Giordan, M., Silva-Neto, A. B., & Aizawa, A. (2015). Relações entre gestos e operações epistêmicas mediadas pela representação estrutural em aulas de Química e suas implicações para a produção de significados. Química Nova na Escola, 37(n. esp.), 82-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0104-8899.20150021

Gregorcic, B., Planinsic, G., & Etkina, E. (2017). Doing Science by Waving Hands: Talk, Symbiotic Gesture, and Interaction with Digital Content as Resources in Student Inquiry. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020104/1-020104/17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020104

Gresczysczyn, M. C. C. (2017). Múltiplas Representações para o ensino de Química Orgânica: uso do infográfico como meio de busca de aplicativos. (Dissertação de mestrado). Programa de Mestrado Profissional em Ensino de Ciências Humanas, Sociais e da Natureza. Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Londrina, PR. Recuperado de http://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br/jspui/bitstream/1/3018/1/LD_PPGEN_M_Gresczysczyn_Marcella%20Cristyanne%20Comar_2017.pdf

Gunel, M., & Yesildag-Hasancebi, F. (2016). Modal Representations and their Role in the Learning Process: A Theoretical and Pragmatic Analysis. Educational Sciences-Theory & Practice, 16(1), 109-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.1.0054

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. London, England: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London, England: Baltimore, 1985.

Hand, B., & Choi, A. (2010). Examining the Impact of Student Use of Multiple Modal Representations in Constructing Arguments in Organic Chemistry Laboratory Classes. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 29-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9155-8

Hodge, R. & Kress, G. (1988). Social Semiotics. Ithaca, New York, United States of America: Cornell University Press.

Hubber, P. (2013). Teacher Perspective of a Representation Construction Approach to Teaching Science. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing Representations to Learn in Science (pp. 134-149). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Hubber, P., Tytler, R., & Haslam, F. (2010). Teaching and Learning about Force with a Representational Focus: Pedagogy and Teacher Change. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9154-9

Hubber, P & Tytler, R. (2013). Models and Learning Science. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber & B. Waldrip, (Eds.), Constructing Representations to Learn in Science (pp. 108-133). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Ianì, F., Cutica, I., & Bucciarelli, M. (2017). Timing of Gestures: Gestures Anticipating or Simultaneous with Speech as Indexes of Text Comprehension in Children and Adults. Cognitive Science, 41(S6), 1549-1566. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12381

Jewitt, C. (2009). The routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London, England: Routledge.

Kapon, S. (2017). Unpacking Sensemaking. Science Education, 101(1), 165-198. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21248

Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

Klein, P. D. & Kirkpatrick, L. C. (2010). Multimodal Literacies in Science: Currency, Coherence and Focus. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 87-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9159-4

Kress, G. ,& Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images: the grammar of visual design. London & New York: Routledge.

Kress, G. (2009). What is Mode? In J. Carey (Ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (pp. 54-67). Nova York, United States of America: Routledge.

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York, United States of America: Routledge.

Laburú, C. E., & Silva, O. H. M. (2011). Multimodos e Múltiplas Representações: fundamentos e perspectivas semióticas para a aprendizagem de conceitos científicos. Investigações em Ensino de Ciências, 16(1), 7-33. Recuperado de https://www.if.ufrgs.br/cref/ojs/index.php/ienci/article/view/244/170

Laburú, C. E., Barros, M. A., & Silva, O. H. M. (2011). Multimodos e múltiplas Representações, aprendizagem significativa e subjetividade: três referenciais conciliáveis da educação científica. Ciência & Educação, 17(2), 469-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-73132011000200014

Laburú, C. E., Zompero, A. F., & Barros, M. A. (2013). Vygotsky e Múltiplas Representações: leituras convergentes para o Ensino de Ciências. Caderno Brasileiro de Ensino de Física, 30(1), 7-24. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2013v30n1p7

Martins, I., Demorais, F., Schaab, B., & Jaques, P. (2016). Pedagogical Agent Gestures to Improve Learner Comprehension of Abstract Concepts in Hints. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 12(3), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2016070106

Mortimer, E. F., Moro, L., & Sá, E. F. (2018). Referenciais teóricos usados na Pesquisa: Discurso, semiótica social e Multimodalidade. In E. F. Mortimer & A. L. Quadros. Multimodalidade no Ensino Superior. Ijuí, RS: Unijuí, pp. 17-53.

Mortimer, E. F., Quadros, A. L., Silva, A. C. A., Sá, E. F.; Moro, L., Silva, P. S., Martins, R. F., & Pereira, R. R. (2014). Interações entre modos semióticos e a construção de significados em Aulas de Ensino Superior. Ensaio: pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 16(3), 121-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172014160306

Mortimer, E. F., & Machado, A. H. (2014). Química Manual do Professor. São Paulo, SP: Scipione.

Nazeem, E. (2015). Multimodality in Science Education as Productive Pedagogy in a PGCE Programme. Perspectives in Education, 33(3), 159-175. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/11660/3812

Nitz, S., Prechtl, H., & Nerdel, C. (2014). Survey of Classroom Use of Representations: Development, Field Test and Multilevel Analysis. Learning Environments Research, 17(3), 401-422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-014-9166-x

Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: a methodological framework. Nova York, United States of America: Routledge.

Oliveira, A. W., Rivera, S., Glass, R., Mastroianni, M., Wizner, F., & Amodeo, V. (2014). Multimodal Semiosis in Science Read-Alouds: Extending beyond Text Delivery. Research in Science Education, 44(5), 651-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9396-4

Piccinini, C., & Martins, I. (2014). Comunicação multimodal na sala de aula de ciências: construindo sentidos com palavras e gestos. Ensaio: pesquisa em Educação em Ciências, 6(1), 24-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172004060103

Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2012). Learning through constructing representations in science: A framework of representational construction affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 2751-2773. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.626462

Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2013a). Representing and Learning in Science. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing Representations to Learn in Science (pp. 1-14) ). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Prain, V. ,& Tytler, R. (2013b). Learning Through the Affordances of Representation Construction. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing Representations to Learn in Science (pp. 66-82). ). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Prain, V., Tytler, R., Hubber, P., & Waldrip, B. (2013). Implications for the Future. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing Representations to Learn in Science (pp. 183-192). ). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2006). An exploratory study of teachers’ and students’ use of multi?modal representations of concepts in primary science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1843-1866. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600718294

Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2008). An exploratory study of teachers’ perspectives about using multi-modal representations of concepts to enhance science learning. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 8(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926150802152152

Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2010). Representing Science Literacies: An Introduction. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9153-x

Prain, V., Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2009). Multiple representation in learning about evaporation. International Journal of Science Education, 31(6), 787–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701824249

Sessa, P., & Trivelato, S. L. F. (2017). Interações dialógicas no ensino de Biologia: modos semióticos e o processo de construção de significados nas atividades de campo. REEC: Revista electrónica de enseñanza de las ciencias, 16(2), 173-195. Recuperado de http://reec.uvigo.es/volumenes/volumen16/REEC_16_2_1_ex1031.pdf

Silva, J. G. (2012). A significação de representações químicas e a filosofia de Wittgenstein. (Tese de doutorado). Faculdade de Educação, Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo, SP.

Souza, P. V., Hernandes, J. L., Andrade, M. A. B. S., & Laburú, C. E. (2017). Multimodos e Múltiplas Representações como proposta didática embasada no conceito de Rede. In Anais XI Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências – XI ENPEC. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brasil. Recuperado de http://www.abrapecnet.org.br/enpec/xi-enpec/anais/resumos/R1221-1.pdf

Tang, K. S., & Moje, E. B. (2010). Relating Multimodal Representations to the Literacies of Science. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 81-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9158-5

Tang, K., Delgado, C., & Moje, E. B. (2014). An Integrative Framework for the Analysis of Multiple and Multimodal Representations for Meaning-Making in Science Education. Science Education, 98(2), 305-326. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21099

Tytler, R., & Prain, V. (2013). The Nature of Student Learning and Knowing in Science. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing Representations to Learn in Science (pp. 171-183). Holanda: Sense Publishers.

Tytler, R., Hubber, P., & Prain, V. (2013). Structuring Learning Sequences. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing Representations to Learn in Science (pp. 51-65). ). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Tytler, R., Hubber, P., Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2013). A Representation construction Approach. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing Representations to Learn in Science (pp. 31-50). ). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber, P., & Haslam, F. (2013). Reasoning in Science Through Representation. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing Representations to Learn in Science (pp. 83-107). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Tytler, R., Prain, V., Hubber, P., & Waldrip, B. (2013). Constructing Representations to Learn in Science. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Ünsal, Z., Jakobson, B., Wickman, P., & Molander, B. (2018). Gesticulating science: Emergent bilingual students' use of gestures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(1), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21415

Vigotski, L. S. (2009). A construção do pensamento e da linguagem. (trad. Paulo Bezerra. 2a ed.), São Paulo, SP: WMF Martins Fontes.

Waldrip, B., & Prain, V. (2013). Teachers’ initial response to a representational focus. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing Representations to Learn in Science (pp. 15-30). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Carolan, J. (2010). Using Multi-Modal Representations to Improve Learning in Junior Secondary Science. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 65-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9157-6

Waldrip, B., Hubber, P., & Prain, V. (2013). Assessment. In R. Tytler, V. Prain, P. Hubber, & B. Waldrip (Eds.), Constructing Representations to Learn in Science (pp. 150-170). ). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Wilson, A. A. (2013). A Typology of Actional?Operational Modes in Earth Science and Implications for Science Literacy Instruction. Science Education, 97(4), 524-549. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21064

Wilson, A. A., Boatright, M. D., & Landon-Hays, M. (2014). Middle School Teachers’ Discipline-Specific Use of Gestures and Implications for Disciplinary Literacy Instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 46(2), 234-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X14532615

Wu, H-K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 821-842. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.103

Ying, Z. (2016). Multimodal Teacher Input and Science Learning in a Middle School Sheltered Classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21295

Yore, L. D., & Hand, B. (2010). Epilogue: Plotting a Research Agenda for Multiple Representations, Multiple Modality, and Multimodal Representational Competency. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9160-y

Publicado

2019-12-30

Cómo citar

Quadros, A. L. de, & Giordan, M. (2019). ROTAS DE TRANSIÇÃO MODAL E O ENSINO DE REPRESENTAÇÕES ENVOLVIDAS NO MODELO CINÉTICO MOLECULAR. Investigaciones En Enseñanza De Las Ciencias, 24(3), 74–100. https://doi.org/10.22600/1518-8795.ienci2019v24n3p74

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a